Pascal Thubert (pthubert) writes:
> - If we keep resource blocks of 10ms in 5G, there will be multiple
> packets, so ASN will need an extension (at least an additional octet
> that would be signaled in band) to count the packet with a finer
> granularity than ASN, within the time slot.
There is
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) writes:
> > Even when the nonce reuse happens, I do not think there is any
> > leak of the network-wide keys in that case. What is lost is the
> > confidentiality of the those messages sharing nonce, i.e., only
> > those messages are broken, not the whole network key.
>
t; ; shwetha.bhand...@gmail.com; 6tisch-cha...@ietf.org; The
> IESG ; 6tisch@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-6tisch-architect...@ietf.org;
> Benjamin Kaduk
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-
> architecture-24: (with COMMENT)
>
>
> Tero Kivine
ietf-6tisch-architect...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-
> architecture-24: (with COMMENT)
>
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) writes:
> >o The cryptographic mechanisms used by [IEEE802154] include the
> > 2-byte sh
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) writes:
>o The cryptographic mechanisms used by [IEEE802154] include the
> 2-byte short address in the calculation of the context. If the
> 2-byte short address is reassigned to another node while the same
> network-wide keys are in operation, it
h-cha...@ietf.org;
> shwetha.bhand...@gmail.com; 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-
> 24: (with COMMENT)
>
> Hi Pascal!
>
> Thank you for publishing -25. It addresses my concern. I have one detailed
>
Hello Roman:
I elided the pieces where we are in sync
> > > ** Section 6. Per “Section 9 of [RFC8453] applies equally to
> > > 6TiSCH”, this reference organizes threats and mitigations around the
> > > CMI and MPI interfaces.
> > > What is the analog to those in this architecture?
> >
> > PT>
11:19 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-6tisch-architect...@ietf.org; 6tisch-cha...@ietf.org;
> shwetha.bhand...@gmail.com; 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-
> 24: (with COMMENT)
>
> Hello Roman:
>
&g
Hello Roman:
Many thanks for your review, your time is much appreciated.
Please see below:
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> ** Why are both Section 3.4 and Section
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-24: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
10 matches
Mail list logo
