Re: [6tisch] Thomas' review of draft-vilajosana-6tisch-globaltime-00

Xavi, Great. Can I ask you to focus your IETF 101 on discussing these different points with the WG? Thomas On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote: > Dear Thomas, > > thanks so much for your quick action. See inline our responses. We need > further discussion at the WG meet

[6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sfx-01 comments

Dear members of the 6TiSCH working group, as with my draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments , during the past weeks, I've attempted to implement SFX as part of my master's thesis. During this process, I've come acros

Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

Hello Xavi, thank you for your comments! Answers inline. I also found another question in my notes, I hope you don't mind me wedging it into this thread: If I understand it correctly, in a 2-Way transaction of a Relocate/Add Request, Node A should only start using the newly negotiated cells afte

[6tisch] 6tisch-security design team meetings -- March 9 and 16 cancelled

Neither Peter nor I can make it this Friday or next Friday (the 16th). Those two design team meetings are cancelled... go read some documents instead. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- signature.asc Description: PGP signature