Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread hiro
Good luck. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too? I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If I'm right, there's no way that we'd get any momentum to turn this around. But your earlier

Re: [9fans] Writing drivers in Plan 9

2008-09-04 Thread hugo rivera
Sadly I cannot find time for Plan 9 for now. I am just too busy with my job in the university and preparing me for some tests in October. Hopefully I can start this thing in November. 2008/9/3 Tom Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:40 AM, hugo rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[9fans] iwp9 - submission deadline extended to Sept 8

2008-09-04 Thread spyros lalis
Dear 9fans, The submission deadline has been extended until Sept 8. If someone has a paper that is nearly ready and still needs more time, please contact directly the PC chair, Richard Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Spyros

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread Michaelian Ennis
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if linux can use binary blobs, why can't plan9 do it too? I think the BLOBs are platform specific, but I may be mistaken. If I'm right, there's no way that we'd get any momentum to turn this around. Sometimes the binary bits are

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread Tim Wiess
That said, how do we mobilise the community to focus on useful drivers? I suppose we start with Ron's wish list, then we explore Russ' partially complete postings (i386 emulation, Centrino drivers, I'm sure I've forgotten many more) and thirdly we post a list of willing contributors,

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread dave . l
This gets punted around every few months and nothing happens. I've done some basic information-gathering but got no further for the usual reasons, so, in an effort to stimulate some inertia, here's a small suggestion ... Is there anyone out there who's gonna be in Volos and wants to

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyone out there who's gonna be in Volos and wants to participate in a driver-writing BOF? I'm not gonna make it, but it's an interesting idea. What would be more useful, possibly, is a tutorial on how to write a driver, with

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread Uriel
Maybe similar sessions for 'file server writing' or 'limbo programming' might be nice for those not familiar with those subjects (and thanks to 9vx and hosted the required setups would allow people with non-plan9 laptops to participate). Peace uriel On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Uriel [EMAIL

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread Uriel
Sounds like a really cool idea, maybe somebody with more experience in the subject wants to give a short introduction, and then people can start to work on their favorite wanted driver (alone or in groups) while the 'expert'(s) in charge of the session can answer questions and help whoever gets

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread ron minnich
Those of us who can't make it could volunteer to be on irc during the sessions, modulo timezone issues (that's what coffee is for). ron

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread lucio
Is there anyone out there who's gonna be in Volos and wants to participate in a driver-writing BOF? Me, kinda goes without saying. ++L

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread lucio
Are you serious? I have a crazy idea: how about you actually write one? I did, once. At least, I extended the PCNet driver for a particular model no one else had catered for. There were a few inconsistencies with expectations, so it never made prime time. Since then, the memory model changed

Re: [9fans] apropos of the glendix post

2008-09-04 Thread lucio
I think the one of the BSD projects, OpenBSD perhaps, used to accept hardware donations to this end. If we had a wayto get the hardware and the technical documentation in the same place as the developers we could get more hardware supported. I believe this is a small factor, but also not an