Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:37 PM, fge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Anthony Sorace ano...@gmail.com wrote:
i like nokia's line, and would love to see a port of Plan 9 (or
Inferno) to the 770 or N800 (there's an even newer one, but i forget
the model off hand and
Hello !
And how about JIT ??
2008/12/19 fge...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Anthony Sorace ano...@gmail.com wrote:
i like nokia's line, and would love to see a port of Plan 9 (or
Inferno) to the 770 or N800 (there's an even newer one, but i forget
the model off hand and
The places that DMAPPEND is used most commonly are log files and mail
boxes.
mailboxes are append only, however
deleting a message requires rewriting
the mailbox, which isn't possible. so
a temporary mbox is written, has its
mode tweaked and then replaces the
mbox. L.mbox is exclusive open
Meh, I keep forgetting to hit reply-all or something.
2008/12/19 erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
That's where I was looking initially -- it looks like that's all only
done when you're connecting to a venti, and it seems like it
definitely happens after the links run anyway. Links happen
i did get the original.
- erik
client by definition knows more than the server.
i assume you mean knows less? the server knows where EOF is and
which files to enforce append-only on. your #1 seems to only exist
because the client doesn't have that info.
2008/12/18 Rudolf Sykora rudolf.syk...@gmail.com:
Hello,
please, what's the easiest way to install python on plan9?
I found python.tgz under fgb. Is that the right way to go?
Thanks
Ruda
Hi Rudolf,
Perl and python are in the /n/sources/extra directories of sources.
This are my notes of
On Fri Dec 19 14:24:52 EST 2008, ano...@gmail.com wrote:
client by definition knows more than the server.
i assume you mean knows less? the server knows where EOF is and
which files to enforce append-only on. your #1 seems to only exist
because the client doesn't have that info.
i think
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Anthony Sorace ano...@gmail.com wrote:
client by definition knows more than the server.
i assume you mean knows less? the server knows where EOF is and
which files to enforce append-only on. your #1 seems to only exist
because the client doesn't have that
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Russ Cox wrote:
Append-only and exclusive-use are properties of files
and need to be enforced uniformly across all clients
to be meaningful. They must be per-file, not per-fd.
Two questions:
1. But before I ask this one: I don't deny that per-file append-only
Two questions:
1. But before I ask this one: I don't deny that per-file append-only
is *extremely* useful. My question is a different one: what is
the danger of N clients accesing the file X in append-only mode
and M clients accesing it in random access mode? Could you,
On Dec 19, 2008, at 8:44 AM, ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@sun.com wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 7:26 PM, ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@sun.com
wrote:
Its fun, yes. But I believe this is more of a
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@sun.com wrote:
Two questions:
1. But before I ask this one: I don't deny that per-file append-only
is *extremely* useful. My question is a different one: what is
the danger of N clients accesing the file X in append-only mode
On Dec 19, 2008, at 11:56 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
Two questions:
1. But before I ask this one: I don't deny that per-file append-
only
is *extremely* useful. My question is a different one: what is
the danger of N clients accesing the file X in append-only mode
and M clients
It is difficult to answer your question without knowing what rewrite
actually does and how mailboxes are structured. But in an imaginary
world where a mailbox is a list of constant sized blocks (sizeiounit)
a bunch of simultaneous appends and rewrites of existing blocks
would work perfectly
if that -1 would be seen on the wire
no. it's just a flag to select the code path that provides the offset,
and entirely internal (just as well).
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
if that -1 would be seen on the wire
no. it's just a flag to select the code path that provides the offset,
and entirely internal (just as well).
I figured as much. Oh well. Sorry, Roman.
ron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A portion of the Mac OS X cat manual page. This was back in July. I
don't remember if this was while I had OS X 10.4 or 10.5. Either way,
it's the same now (10.5.6).
CAT(1)BSD General Commands
Manual
Have people seen http://wiki.ubnt.com/wiki/index.php/RouterStation ? Any
idea on what porting the kernel to this guy would be like?
Thanks.
--nwf;
pgpkIwKBWkcjF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
