> >> > What? The findroot code reads:
> >>
> >> read the code again; findroot doesn't come into play.
> >
> > it most certainly does!
>
> the whole point was that given -r, findroot doesn't come into play.
>
> if NINEROOT is not set, what does your version of 9vx do (without -r)?
In short i
>> > What? The findroot code reads:
>>
>> read the code again; findroot doesn't come into play.
>
> it most certainly does!
the whole point was that given -r, findroot doesn't come into play.
if NINEROOT is not set, what does your version of 9vx do (without -r)?
Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> said:
> > What? The findroot code reads:
>
> read the code again; findroot doesn't come into play.
it most certainly does!
in main...
if(!bootboot){
if(localroot == nil && (localroot = findroot()) == nil)
pani
> What? The findroot code reads:
read the code again; findroot doesn't come into play.
Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> said:
> > but both
> > of the hard-coded paths in 9vx main.c are obviously in RSC's home
> > directories
>
> it's not hardcoded;
What? The findroot code reads:
static char*
findroot(void)
{
static char cwd[1024];
int i;
char buf[102
> but both
> of the hard-coded paths in 9vx main.c are obviously in RSC's home directories
it's not hardcoded; you can use -r as Russ said. the difference is:
"use default unless -r is given" vs. "use default unless
getenv(NINEROOT) is given". -r makes it very obvious what the root is
and proba
EBo said:
>
> > > Hunting on the we it looks like Ron Cox is the goto person for that
> > > (http://bitbucket.org/rsc/vx32/changesets/ dated 2009-12-27):
> >
> > Ah, my bad. I was looking at the old, pre-bitbucket repository (in my
> > defense, still linked from swtch.com/9vx). I take it back.
> > Hunting on the we it looks like Ron Cox is the goto person for that
> > (http://bitbucket.org/rsc/vx32/changesets/ dated 2009-12-27):
>
> Ah, my bad. I was looking at the old, pre-bitbucket repository (in my
> defense, still linked from swtch.com/9vx). I take it back.
hmmm... the sources I a
On Apr 12, 2010, at 22:53, EBo wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:23, hiro wrote:
and what is src/9vx/a/devcap.c ?
As far as my system and (as far as I can tell) the
Mercurial repository: fictional. Something you'd
like to share with the class?
Hunting on the we it looks like Ron Cox is the got
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:23, hiro wrote:
>
> > and what is src/9vx/a/devcap.c ?
>
> As far as my system and (as far as I can tell) the
> Mercurial repository: fictional. Something you'd
> like to share with the class?
Hunting on the we it looks like Ron Cox is the goto person for that
(http://b
On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:23, hiro wrote:
and what is src/9vx/a/devcap.c ?
As far as my system and (as far as I can tell) the
Mercurial repository: fictional. Something you'd
like to share with the class?
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> > the problem you're addressing can't be addressed well through #Z.
> > unix systems act differently than plan 9 ones do. there are a host
> > of locking, etc. questions that #Z doesn't handle either. it would be
> > easier
> > to use a plan 9 fs (ken fs, cwfs, fossil). then you wouldn't need
and what is src/9vx/a/devcap.c ?
On 4/12/10, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2010/4/12 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
>> > I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
>> > think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
>> > sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a
And the users are running in single sandboxes?
On 4/12/10, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2010/4/12 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
>> > I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
>> > think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
>> > sandbox. But what if we wa
2010/4/12 erik quanstrom :
>> 2010/4/12 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
>> > I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
>> > think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
>> > sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a working security system for
>> > multiple
Yes, I saw this link before, but I mean some current sources, what
happens with Plan9 just right now.
Thanks.
On 12 апр, 16:54, gd...@rejaa.com (Gabriel Díaz) wrote:
> Hello
>
> http://swtch.com/plan9history/
>
> may be is sometthing on the lines you're looking for.
>
> slds.
>
> gabi
> 2010/4/12 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
> > I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
> > think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
> > sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a working security system for
> > multiple users in 9vx. Would it be - or
2010/4/12 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
> I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
> think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
> sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a working security system for
> multiple users in 9vx. Would it be - or is it - po
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:30:11AM +, Boo wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Is there any revision control system or SCM of Plan 9 sources? I would
> like to read changesets, but don't know where I can find them.
> Thanks.
There's a mirror of the daily fossil snapshots from 2002/1212 to some time
last year,
I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I
think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a
sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a working security system for
multiple users in 9vx. Would it be - or is it - possible?
On 4/12/10, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> C
Hello
http://swtch.com/plan9history/
may be is sometthing on the lines you're looking for.
slds.
gabi
- Original Message
From: Boo
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 11:30:11 AM
Subject: [9fans] revision control system or SCM of Plan 9 sources
Hi folks,
Is there any re
> you must also exit if ~ $user none. i'd also recommend
> aborting if ~ $home /. you don't want none making
> files in /. on a regular plan 9 system, that's no worry, but
> 9vx, ...
I also tried to add test -z $user for the null string. It turns out that
user=`{cat /dev/user} dies with the e
> Can't we then fix 9vx?
> (Stepping in to the tradition of concern of reception: This is not a
> rhetoric question)
it's not 9vx, but #Z. and no, #Z is going to be limited by
the underlying system.
- erik
On 4/12/10, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> Following on several peoples advice and a suggested code snippet from Erik
>> I've added the following before the check for profile:
>>
>> if(! test -d $home){
>> echo no home directory $home
>> exit homeless
>> }
>> if(! ls -ld $home >[2=] | grep -s
erik quanstrom said:
> > Following on several peoples advice and a suggested code snippet from Erik
> > I've added the following before the check for profile:
> >
> > if(! test -d $home){
> > echo no home directory $home
> > exit homeless
> > }
> > if(! ls -ld $home >[2=] | grep -s '^d-r
> That is what I did for the first prototype. I thought this would be a beeter
> solution.
>
> Out of curiosity, have I hit a nerve or something. Have I somehow offended?
> I'm just a bit confused by some of the responses.
no. i don't think anyone's offended. and i personally
think the env v
> Following on several peoples advice and a suggested code snippet from Erik
> I've added the following before the check for profile:
>
> if(! test -d $home){
> echo no home directory $home
> exit homeless
> }
> if(! ls -ld $home >[2=] | grep -s '^d-rwx.* '$user){
> echo bad perm
On Mon Apr 12 05:32:39 EDT 2010, boo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Is there any revision control system or SCM of Plan 9 sources? I would
> like to read changesets, but don't know where I can find them.
> Thanks.
not really. if you want to read revision history, you
can use history(1) on sour
Francisco J Ballesteros said:
> you could also use a script to call 9vx as you please.
That is what I did for the first prototype. I thought this would be a beeter
solution.
Out of curiosity, have I hit a nerve or something. Have I somehow offended?
I'm just a bit confused by some of the res
you could also use a script to call 9vx as you please.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:22 AM, EBo wrote:
>
>> Why isn't 9vx -r yourdir good enough?
>
> it is if you want to force all users to specify the root directory every
> single time they run 9vx, or if you want to use an alternative root. If I
does your name space mount /srv/usb ?
I mean, does it mount the files served from usbd?
I'll take a look to usbfat in any case.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, antonio@gmail.com
wrote:
> I reinstalled with a new iso before to read your mail.
> With the new installation I can mount one old
I reinstalled with a new iso before to read your mail.
With the new installation I can mount one old pendrive (128mb) with
the new ones I got this:
mount: mount /n/sdU2.0: unknown format
and in the screen like a kernel message: usb/disk... disk: reset:
device is detached
(My computer is an old thin
Hi folks,
Is there any revision control system or SCM of Plan 9 sources? I would
like to read changesets, but don't know where I can find them.
Thanks.
33 matches
Mail list logo
