On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:47 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
They have the added advantage of the exponent after the I.
Reminds me of the degrees of infinity.
So instead of sucketh-null, I guess they are sucketh-1?
Ron,
the suck is uncountable
ak
Is ratrace usable on native Plan 9 (I understand it's in use on 9vx
thus far)? I don't see a /proc/n/syscall file for any of my processes;
is there some kernel patch for this?
Thanks,
ak
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:14 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
Glibc /bin/date on Linux runs around
In theory, with these I would simply get a binary file from
the assembly, which I could then run on, say, dosbox in
8086 mode in Windows?
You'd get a raw file with instructions in it.
It would be up to you to turn that into an
appropriate executable. (If you renamed it
foo.com that would
On Sat Sep 4 03:59:16 EDT 2010, aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net wrote:
Is ratrace usable on native Plan 9 (I understand it's in use on 9vx
thus far)? I don't see a /proc/n/syscall file for any of my processes;
is there some kernel patch for this?
acid is perfectly capabible of doing this.
see the
eric quanstrom:
if i read the marvell specification correctly, it uses i²s, not i²c.
wikipedia has a pointer to the phillips specification.
It uses i²s to for the data (sound) transport. the control for the codec
is seperate, the codec is a cs42l51, which has an i²s interface for data
and either
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Akshat Kumar
aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net wrote:
Is ratrace usable on native Plan 9 (I understand it's in use on 9vx
thus far)? I don't see a /proc/n/syscall file for any of my processes;
is there some kernel patch for this?
One could take the modified version
Though Immediate Command/Response Interface should work, CORB/RIRB is
the recommended way to send/receive commands/responses from the codec.
Reading the datasheet of the codec, I havn't found any mention of CORB or
RIRB, so I would hazard a guess that that's not what I want. But still,
what
Anyone tried to install from a very recent plan9.iso?
I just downloaded the latest one this morning. I'm trying to install into a
VMware ESXi virtual machine. I installed another just about a week ago, and
did not encounter any trouble. I frequently have to plug in the correct SCSI
device
apologies for the noise... please disregard.
Thought I had the lsilogic controller working once before, but guess not.
buslogic it is.
-Original Message-
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net on behalf of Benjamin Huntsman
Sent: Sat 9/4/2010 3:37 PM
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: [9fans] latest
On Sat Sep 4 19:09:33 EDT 2010, bhunts...@mail2.cu-portland.edu wrote:
apologies for the noise... please disregard.
Thought I had the lsilogic controller working once before, but guess not.
buslogic it is.
[...]
cpu0: 2796MHz PentiumIV/Xeon loop 47254
apm ax=f000 cx=f000 dx=40 di=
For ages I've run diskless terminals under Parallels, and aux/vga would
quite cheerfully resize the Parallels window to match anything I told it.
Recently I had to migrate from Parallels to Fusion. Resizing doesn't work any
more.
Furthermore, I'm buggered if I can programmatically figure out
[ Let me try again, this time hitting Post vs |fmt :-) ]
For ages I've run diskless terminals under Parallels, and aux/vga would
quite cheerfully resize the Parallels window to match anything I told it.
Recently I had to migrate from Parallels to Fusion. Resizing doesn't
work any more.
i came across this the other day - i thought i'd finally found a
machine for which P9 supports nothing.
in fact i beat you - no PCI devices at all.
any help appreciated. it boots any flavour of windows. new HP Pav quadcore.
brucee
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:02 AM, erik quanstrom
On Sat Sep 4 22:56:22 EDT 2010, bruce.el...@gmail.com wrote:
i came across this the other day - i thought i'd finally found a
machine for which P9 supports nothing.
in fact i beat you - no PCI devices at all.
any help appreciated. it boots any flavour of windows. new HP Pav quadcore.
14 matches
Mail list logo
