Re: [9fans] IBM Research Internship Position Available

2010-10-01 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Anssi Porttikivi porttik...@gmail.com wrote: Plan 9 pages are down :-( It is no longer necessary to send these messages to the list. I setup pingdom several months ago to automatically monitor plan9.bell-labs.com and it sends email to folks there when things go

[9fans] need a bed in seattle?

2010-10-01 Thread Bruce Ellis
i have a week in the marriott, double room. my cohort, emmett will only need his bunk for a few of those days. if you need a place to stay for IWP9, or are about to book a cheapy let me know. sorry, no doggie. brucee

[9fans] stupid kernel question

2010-10-01 Thread Steve Simon
how does kernel code call plan9 system calls, does it perform a trap from kernel back into kernel space and make the request just like a user process or is there a more direct, subtle route? thanks, -Steve

Re: [9fans] stupid kernel question

2010-10-01 Thread erik quanstrom
On Fri Oct 1 15:25:16 EDT 2010, st...@quintile.net wrote: how does kernel code call plan9 system calls, does it perform a trap from kernel back into kernel space and make the request just like a user process or is there a more direct, subtle route? the short answer is that it doesn't. but

Re: [9fans] stupid kernel question

2010-10-01 Thread Francisco J Ballesteros
I'm kind of sleepy. But if I managed to read your mail correctly... when the kernel wants to do something that can be done with a system call (mostly read, write, open, ...), it uses the device tab directly, like in devtab[c-type].write(chan, ), using Chan instead of fds in this case. I

Re: [9fans] stupid kernel question

2010-10-01 Thread Steve Simon
Thanks to all who replied on-list and off it. using namec and calling through the device tab looks like what I need, calling sysopen() with an array of integers seemed just too crufty, I knew there must be a better way ☺ -Steve