Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx

2011-05-21 Thread Steve Simon
I put the OSX launchd ritual on the wiki a couple of years ago. and here it is: http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/9pfs.plist/index.html Ugh, that has been throughly eaten by the wiki formatting, I think this is the bit I added:

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread Charles Forsyth
the most straightforward fix for nsec is to change it back to do the obvious thing: open the file, read in the time data, close the file and return the value. we might like to add the cache back in, since a grep of /sys/src/cmd suggests that it might be useful to do that. most programs were fine

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
we've had several attempts at trying to guess in the library's guts when the cached value(s) have gone wrong, but they haven't worked because there are too many cases and the library function can't detect them precisely if at all. also, using the current process as the cache key probably

[9fans] Calendar for your next last doom days?

2011-05-21 Thread tlaronde
Since I have noticed that all the lists I'm subscribed to are almost silent, and since north america generates the majority of the traffic on these lists, I suspect there is something to do with yours doom days. Could US citizens provide a calendar about the next final days so that one can

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
syslog, times and truerand(!) also would benefit. of all of them so far, only times(2) really is per-process. and time(2). - erik

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread Charles Forsyth
and time(2). i didn't include that because it calls nsec

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sat May 21 18:12:35 EDT 2011, fors...@terzarima.net wrote: and time(2). i didn't include that because it calls nsec time calls an internal function, oldtime(), that adds another private file descriptor. i suppose that could be killed off by now. - erik