Sending from phone, please pardon errors.
There are projects that use gsoc for docs and the like. I would see nothing
wrong with someone contributing code to the installer -- especially someone
with less familiarity with p9 than most 9fans -- they will likely taake
longer than 1-2 weeks. Additiona
On Mar 14, 2012, at 18:15 , Charles Forsyth wrote:
> At least in the past, I'm sure I followed a discussion that the summer of
> code was intended (ie, required) to produce code, not documentation
> or packaging, although that might have changed.
This is true. All projects in GSoC are required to
At least in the past, I'm sure I followed a discussion that the summer of
code was intended (ie, required) to produce code,
not documentation or packaging, although that might have changed.
On 14 March 2012 19:38, John Floren wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
> > May I suggest
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
who use it for research?
who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
who use it commercial in a business?
who use it on an embedded device?
who programs with limbo?
what else?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
> May I suggest to add an "easy" project to the list: review Plan9
> installation.
>
> The "howto install without" (explaining how to create a Plan9 realm
> from another OS if the CD can not be used) that I posted a while
> ago did not attract a lot of att
May I suggest to add an "easy" project to the list: review Plan9
installation.
The "howto install without" (explaining how to create a Plan9 realm
from another OS if the CD can not be used) that I posted a while
ago did not attract a lot of attention. But dealing with the install,
I saw many detai
On Wed Mar 14 14:03:34 EDT 2012, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote:
> > >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> > >
> > > ...
> >
> > Let's not take this one completely off the table yet. SSHv2
> > would be extremely useful in helping open up communication
> > with external systems a
> >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> >
> > ...
>
> Let's not take this one completely off the table yet. SSHv2
> would be extremely useful in helping open up communication
> with external systems again.
As Erik said, there is a substantial effort here, probably
more than w
Today I was driving long time to my working place and I had time to think about realizing projects at Plan 9 / Octopus base.
First I realize practically, that I will have more than one octopus PC the same as I have more than one Mac-Server today.
There are different contexts of usage and you will n
Speaking of which... what would be the trick to make libsec visible
for an APE source?
--
- Yaroslav
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> Do you see this as a potential GSoC effort? The sans-ape version,
> build based off CPython 2.7 or 3.x? There are more dependencies
> than just Python, but if we did have this updated then there would be
> more opportunity for people to expe
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>
> >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> >
> > This has obvious utility, but I'm hesitant to add it without a
> > mentor who can vouch for its suitability for a summer-sized
> > student project, and who'd be willing to ment
> call me today.
the guys in dark suits are here to take away my
email card ...
sorry for the spam.
- erik
call me today. 815 715 9180.
- erik
> I believe the biggest sore spot is the lack of a modern Python port.
+1.
particularly one that compiles on every architechture. the current code
has a few mistakes like defining FPINVAL (depending on the architecture)
instead of including float.h.
> Ideally we could have a more complete por
The Python libraries expect an APE environment, and that assumption is
deeply built in to it.
The previous attempt to do a so-called "native" port ended up writing large
chunks of APE in Python,
which was a bit of a waste of time, or it couldn't run all the existing
things, such as Mercurial.
Using
> Oddly enough, that idea does not come with the rider, "And then force
> Peter to use the library exclusively". I somehow doubt that acme will
[snip]
Be sure I will never downgrade to bells and whistles that add no
functionality, hewever, others would.hen rewrite every other's program
UI?
:-)
Be
17 matches
Mail list logo
