i'm inclined to extend the ethernet interface an etherx/ctl file that
accepted commands along the lines of ssid, bssid, and channel to
configure the connection. did the wavelan driver not do this for a reason
beyond changing devether? any better ideas?
there's already a ctl file. it's in the
echo mtu 9000/net/ether0/clone
interesting, i didn't realise clone had been overloaded like that, i just
knew about the ctl file in the connection directory.
that's plenty convenient, if a little strange.
i'm sure you can do this with your wireless commands as well.
you'll need to set
# remove spaces from file names /// does not work
EXT=boo
rm run
for (old in `{9 ls *.$EXT}) {
new=`{echo $old | tr -d ' ' }
echo mv $old $new run
}
# this works, but is ugly:
# remove unwanted chars from file names
EXT=boo
9 ls *.$EXT foo
9 cat foo | 9 tr -c [0-9][a-z][A-Z]'.''\x0a'
2012/3/21 Peter A. Cejchan tyap...@gmail.com:
for (old in `{9 ls *.$EXT}) {
Here you are iterating over the elements of `{9 ls *.$EXT}, sepparated
by $ifs. Therefore, spaces are breaking your lines into word fields.
This is not what you want.
Your second example directly process whole lines
PCMCIA:
Wavelan PC24E-H-FC
aka Avaya World Card Silver
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
PCMCIA:
Wavelan PC24E-H-FC
aka Avaya World Card Silver
aka Lucent Orinoco Silver
aka IBM High Rate Wireless LAN
etc.
-sl
aka Lucent Orinoco Silver
aka IBM High Rate Wireless LAN
etc.
Firsthand experience only ?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
aka Lucent Orinoco Silver
aka IBM High Rate Wireless LAN
etc.
Firsthand experience only ?
Perhaps it's a faulty assumption that all PC24E-H-FC cards are created
equal. I've seen them branded many different ways.
-sl
ifs='
' for (old in `{9 ls *.$EXT}) {
i think ls and the temporary file are getting in the
way. if you use globbing and execing directly from
the shell you can avoid quoting problems. for example,
for(old in *^' '^*.$EXT)
ifs=$nl mv $old `{echo $old | sed 's/ //g'}
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:08:57 +0100
Paschke Christoph c.pasc...@me.com wrote:
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
I now use Plan 9 for everything that does not involve 3D graphics, the
www, or email. The latter is because as far as I'm aware there's no way
to
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I now use Plan 9 for everything that does not involve 3D graphics, the
www, or email. The latter is because as far as I'm aware there's no way
to get a threaded message view.
I don't think it would be much effort
On 3/14/2012 4:08 PM, Paschke Christoph wrote:
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
who use it for research?
who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
who use it commercial in a business?
who use it on an embedded device?
who programs with
I use a Vonets USB WiFi Bridge vap11g I found on ebay for less than
$10, I wrote a little driver to have it set its channel and ssid.
I didn't have any documentation, so I snooped the usb traffic bridged
to a windows instance running in virtualbox.
Jerome
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM,
Perhaps initially: over an IP network, 9P used to run over IL.
still does, including on the system i'm sending this from.
What advantages does it have over TCP? Does it worths the effort of
tailoring it back in, esp. for a fossil/venti site?
--
- Yaroslav
On Wed Mar 21 16:11:41 EDT 2012, yari...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps initially: over an IP network, 9P used to run over IL.
still does, including on the system i'm sending this from.
What advantages does it have over TCP? Does it worths the effort of
tailoring it back in, esp. for a
What advantages does it have over TCP?
Significantly simpler implementation.
Lower overhead, giving better speed over local links.
Also, although not an advantage of IL per se, there are a few
advantages to Plan 9 having another protocol in the stack,
especially one which can run 9p. It helps
What advantages does it have over TCP?
Significantly simpler implementation.
Lower overhead, giving better speed over local links.
it's also message based. so things like rx depend on a protocol
like il that preserves 0-byte writes.
- erik
On Mar 21, 2012, at 16:27 , erik quanstrom wrote:
(in fact, i'd go further than il. why do we need the ip in il?)
I'd love to have an IP-free, 9p-capable network in the mix. Plan 9
had this, way back when, with nonet (?), but that didn't survive
the removal of the streams system in the 3rd
I'd love to have an IP-free, 9p-capable network in the mix. Plan 9
had this, way back when, with nonet (?), but that didn't survive
the removal of the streams system in the 3rd edition (I know you
know this already,but I'm not sure how widely it's known).
i'm probablly missing something, but
thanks, that's great.
the retransmission interval is probally off by 3/4
orders of magnitude for today's local networks.
50-500µs would be a decent static retransmit interval.
(goes to show that timing sleeps in ms anachronistic.)
- erik
importing /net is possible.
just recently replaced openwrt linux nat router with a plan9 machine
importing its /net.alt to avoid problems with random tcp connection
drops.
wrote a simple socks server so windows can use it as a gateway too.
even use bittorrent thru that thing with udp relay :)
just recently replaced openwrt linux nat router with a plan9 machine
importing its /net.alt to avoid problems with random tcp connection
drops.
where's it importing /net.alt from?
- erik
gateway machine has two ethernet cards. /net.alt is the external
internet facing side where i get ip over dhcp from cable modem.
the /net is the internal local network.
running import gateway /net.alt on random plan9 machine to import
the internet.
--
cinap
23 matches
Mail list logo
