Hello,
I found the annoucement for Shiva plug support
(http://marc.info/?l=9fansm=125849399830547w=2) and I was wondering
what progress has been made with the port. I looked in /sys/src/9/kw
and it looks like there has been more recent development, but could
someone give me a quick summary of
i have several (guru and sheeva) running plan9. they're configured as
cpu's and boot from a file server (x86 laptop auth+cpu+fs).
i've had the most problems with power supplies on both models; going
by my sample size, they have a 25% combined failure rate.
-Skip
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:42 AM,
On May 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
i have several (guru and sheeva) running plan9. they're configured as
cpu's and boot from a file server (x86 laptop auth+cpu+fs).
i've had the most problems with power supplies on both models; going
by my sample size, they have a 25%
Hello
I just installed 9front onto the second partition of my main SSD drive
and when I boot
using grub with 'chainloader +1' I get a PBS check which looks to pass
and then the
message 'no fat'. I am thinking that my installation might be out of
sector range on the
drive; I installed on the
the pbs managed to load 9bootfat but 9bootfat wasnt able
to find the fat partition it came from.
we pass 32bit lba's to the bios read sector routines,
so theres nothing inside 9boot itself that would prevent
this from working i think.
9bootfat does its search by walking all partition table
9bootfat does its search by walking all partition table
entries (primary and secondary) on the bootdrive that
are marked as active.
Reading the grub docs, it sounds like an active partition is marked
bootable and only one partition can be marked that way. Currently my
linux partition is
Toggling the bootable flag on the plan9 partition did allow it to start booting.
It then looked to be iterating over the drives, where on my harddisks I got:
sdE0 disk name/id
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
sdE5 disk name/id
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
This
On Sun May 13 21:20:40 EDT 2012, burton.samog...@gmail.com wrote:
Toggling the bootable flag on the plan9 partition did allow it to start
booting.
It then looked to be iterating over the drives, where on my harddisks I got:
sdE0 disk name/id
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
bad disk
Attached is the output of lspci. I'll see if I can get it to fully
boot to get the output of the other command.
--
Burton
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:56 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
On Sun May 13 21:20:40 EDT 2012, burton.samog...@gmail.com wrote:
Toggling the bootable flag
00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801IR/IO/IH (ICH9R/DO/DH) 6 port
SATA AHCI Controller (rev 02)
03:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE6101/6102
single-port PATA133 interface (rev b1)
i assume that you're attached to 00:1f:2, the sata controller due to the
On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:36:06 -0400
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
On Wed May 9 10:38:21 EDT 2012, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
aiju wrote an arm emulator for 9front some time ago and
i remember he implemented floating point on it.
why was it done this way rather than
On Sun, 13 May 2012 18:22:02 -0600
Burton Samograd burton.samog...@gmail.com wrote:
9bootfat does its search by walking all partition table
entries (primary and secondary) on the bootdrive that
are marked as active.
Reading the grub docs, it sounds like an active partition is marked
12 matches
Mail list logo
