## How to do this with [acme | sam | sed ] ?
# compound commands
# remove outermost pair of braces: abcd(x+(y-z))efgh -- abcdx+(y-z)efgh
[ no idea :-( ]
# remove semicolon before // comments: xyz;[tab][space]*// -- xyz
[ Edit /;[ ]*\/\// Edit s/;// # find and remove
On 11 January 2013 12:19, Peter A. Cejchan tyap...@gmail.com wrote:
# remove outermost pair of braces: abcd(x+(y-z))efgh -- abcdx+(y-z)efgh
This, I believe, can't be achieved only with regexps. I'd write a
small external program and use it as a filter.
# prefix to postfix operator: ++i --
for the third:
/\+\+[a-zA-Z_]+[0-9a-zA-Z_]*/{
x/\+\+/d
a/++/
}
the braces stuff is pretty tough, but maybe someone will have an idea.
however it is really easy to do it by hand in acme.
click on the inside of the opening paren with a double click then click
button 2
(while still holding down
how it come i didn't realize that ;-) !
thanks,
peter
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Bence Fábián beg...@gmail.com wrote:
for the third:
/\+\+[a-zA-Z_]+[0-9a-zA-Z_]*/{
x/\+\+/d
a/++/
}
the braces stuff is pretty tough, but maybe someone will have an idea.
however it is really easy to
On 11/01/2013 12:19, Peter A. Cejchan wrote:
## How to do this with [acme | sam | sed ] ?
# compound commands
# remove outermost pair of braces: abcd(x+(y-z))efgh -- abcdx+(y-z)efgh
[ no idea :-( ]
Is this enough?
echo 'abcd(x+(y-z))efgh' | sed 's;\(;;' | sed 's;(.*)\);\1;'
On Friday 11 of January 2013 13:24:12 Peter A. Cejchan wrote:
I am now on p9p and this does not work - at least with (... )*
using the \1 (used to be undocumented on plan9) may be sometimes easier
Edit s/\+\+([A-Za-z]+[A-Za-z0-9])*/\1++/
oughta be
Edit s/\+\+([A-Za-z]+[A-Za-z0-9]*)/\1++/
On 11/01/2013 14:10, Peter A. Cejchan wrote:
echo 'abcd(x+(y-z))efgh' | sed 's;\(;;' | sed 's;(.*)\);\1;'
Thanks, this is fine for my purpose (porting from C to Go), thanks!
Just removing parens around for and if statements on a single line.
| 9 sed 's/\(//; s/(.*)\)/\1/'
(linux's
# remove outermost pair of braces: abcd(x+(y-z))efgh -- abcdx+(y-z)efgh
[ no idea :-( ]
this is made simple since * is greedy:
Edit s:\((.*)\):\1:g
On Fri Jan 11 06:45:39 EST 2013, rudolf.syk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2013 12:19, Peter A. Cejchan tyap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2013 15:24, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
# remove outermost pair of braces: abcd(x+(y-z))efgh -- abcdx+(y-z)efgh
[ no idea :-( ]
this is made simple since * is greedy:
Edit s:\((.*)\):\1:g
Sure, this (the greediness) basically already stands behind
I'd like to be able to use a disk in both Plan 9 and Linux. FAT seems
to have some issues with sufficiently large partitions, so that's out.
Plan9Port doesn't have fossil in the repo, although I've found
patches. ext2srv may be an option, but I have no idea how reliable it
would actually be.
Am I
Hi !
It's useless, even from contrib/iru
2013/1/11 John Floren j...@jfloren.net
I'd like to be able to use a disk in both Plan 9 and Linux. FAT seems
to have some issues with sufficiently large partitions, so that's out.
Plan9Port doesn't have fossil in the repo, although I've found
Can someone enlighten me about the history of /$objtype/include/u.h and why APE
chose to do /sys/include/ape/u.h? There are a few cases where getting specific
Plan 9 libraries massaged enough to be used from APE source gets to be a little
more awkward because u.h is not architecture
/sys/include/ape/u.h
I have a distant memory that this was a result of
Andrey and Presotto's work to get links to build and run
on plan9.
-Steve
i think fat is still the best option, even tho it has these limitations.
virtually every operating system can deal with fat, and the implementations
are robust and tolerant to errors because they are pretty much expected.
ext2srv doesnt support jurnaling.
--
cinap
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:24 PM, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
i think fat is still the best option, even tho it has these limitations.
virtually every operating system can deal with fat, and the implementations
are robust and tolerant to errors because they are pretty much expected.
ext2srv
dossrv always had fat32 support. you'r probably refering to disk/format,
9bootfat and pbs which do support fat32 now in 9front.
--
cinap
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:52 PM, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
dossrv always had fat32 support. you'r probably refering to disk/format,
9bootfat and pbs which do support fat32 now in 9front.
--
cinap
Thanks, you're entirely right, I was thinking of disk/format.
john
I noticed the other day that I was offered exFAT when formatting a 2T drive
on windows 7. I know nothing about it except the sample space of reading
one page on the web. Any insights? Is this FAT48 or something newish and
compatible in some transfinite sense.
brucee
On 12 January 2013 10:58,
from the wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT
Microsoft has not released the official exFAT file system specification,
and a restrictive license from Microsoft is required in order to make and
distribute exFAT implementations. Microsoft also asserts patents on exFAT
which make
If you ever mount an extN partition with ext2fs, always remember to
unmount it before reboot/shutdown. I remember having trouble with
that.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, John Floren j...@jfloren.net wrote:
I'd like to be able to use a disk in both Plan 9 and Linux. FAT seems
to have some
20 matches
Mail list logo
