Hello. I am writing to 9fans to solicit discussion (and hopefully consensus)
about a proposed patch to import(4) to match the options that currently exist
in exportfs(4). I have submitted a patch(1) to sources to be found in
sources/patch/importz. The readme and manpages for that patch also
I apologize for the resend. I pasted text written in acme without |fmt first.
I'm blushing.
Hello. I am writing to 9fans to solicit discussion (and hopefully
consensus) about a proposed patch to import(4) to match the options
that currently exist in exportfs(4). I have submitted a patch(1) to
On 27 February 2013 08:24, mycrof...@sphericalharmony.com wrote:
I hope this post leads to constructive discussion of the import/exportfs
protocol.
As you'll have noticed, it isn't a great protocol as it stands. I don't
think your option makes it worse.
Thanks for the detailed discussion. I
i assumed you wanted a b c as command line arguments in the second case,
not echoed in.
in the first case, you indexed a variable. in the second case, you indexed
nothing.
% rc -c 'echo @ $*(2-) @' a b c
@ b c @
On 27 February 2013 15:41, Steve Simon st...@quintile.net wrote:
Hi,
rc is not
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:36:14PM +0100, hiro wrote:
http://plan10.tumblr.com/
I think this project was renamed 'plan9port'
I'd have called it Plan A.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
http://plan10.tumblr.com/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM, hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote:
http://plan10.tumblr.com/
I'll set up the wiki
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:18 PM, David du Colombier 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
The Intel ICH9 SATA controller is listed in the wiki, but
does anyone know if the Intel ICH9R works?
Yes, it is supported in AHCI mode by the sdiahci driver.
Great! Thanks
q
There is/was a Plan B. Some of the ideas went into Octopus I think...
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Devon H. O'Dell devon.od...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/2/27 David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com:
I'd have called it Plan A.
[Insert horrific Plan B joke here.]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM,
yes, octopus was a better plan.
both should be still avail from our web site.
On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:39 PM, David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
There is/was a Plan B. Some of the ideas went into Octopus I think...
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Devon H. O'Dell devon.od...@gmail.com
Do you guys still use it at lsub?
On Feb 27, 2013, at 17:54, Francisco J Ballesteros n...@lsub.org wrote:
yes, octopus was a better plan.
both should be still avail from our web site.
On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:39 PM, David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
There is/was a Plan B. Some of
until a few weeks ago. it has been retired now.
we are working on the next one, but it will take time.
On Feb 28, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Matthew Veety mve...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you guys still use it at lsub?
On Feb 27, 2013, at 17:54, Francisco J Ballesteros n...@lsub.org wrote:
yes, octopus
Charles Forsyth charles.fors...@gmail.com wrote:
As you'll have noticed, it isn't a great protocol as it stands. I don't
think your option makes it worse.
Thanks for your perspective. I'm glad that my long-winded explanation
didn't obscure the basic logic too much. It makes sense for import
I already sent this mail, but it seems that 9fans didn't
receive it.
The g verb in print(2) does not work properly. The precision
flag (%.ng) is supposed to print n significant figures, but
it prints n+1 significant figures. This change fixes this
behaviour.
diff -r d6b623d4cac0
14 matches
Mail list logo
