On 19.12.2014 19:10, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>
> I have a project for which I need 9p on iOS. Anyone have an Objective C
> module that'll do that, or experience fitting in a C library? I'm looking for
> something much more self-contained than what's found in the drawterm port.
maybe you'd like to
I can reuse code from u9fs, I did that for mac9p.
Linking C to obj-C is straightforward.
> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>
> I have a project for which I need 9p on iOS. Anyone have an Objective C
> module that'll do that, or experience fitting in a C library? I'm looking f
I have a project for which I need 9p on iOS. Anyone have an Objective C module
that'll do that, or experience fitting in a C library? I'm looking for
something much more self-contained than what's found in the drawterm port.
Em 19/12/2014 06:35, "Richard Miller" <9f...@hamnavoe.com> escreveu:
>
> > in reality the kernel is the same modulo some drivers and one variable
( e.g. no vga in cpu servers).
>
> It's actually quite easy to make a single binary which can be configured
> at boot time to be either cpu or terminal,
Thanks, David, for the answers.
> That said, now that Plan 9 is not as actively maintained
> as it used to be, 9legacy might move to his own
> full distribution.
Are then 9legacy and 9atom too apart to somehow
"merge" them?
Ruda
> I haven't ever use 9vx. In what sense you find it more useful than
> 9front?
9vx is really just a kernel, so you can use 9vx with any of the
Plan 9, 9atom or 9front user space.
Also, 9vx have a different purpose than a Plan 9 installation.
For example, you can use 9vx on top of Linux, as a term
On 19 December 2014 at 04:11, da Tyga wrote:
> You could also consider 9vx especially if you are tempted to try running
> under Qemu or some other virtualised environment.
> Although I'm only at the exploratory stage, I find 9vx more useful than
> 9front.
Well, I'd really like to try p9 proper ag
> in reality the kernel is the same modulo some drivers and one variable ( e.g.
> no vga in cpu servers).
It's actually quite easy to make a single binary which can be configured
at boot time to be either cpu or terminal, depending on a plan9.ini variable.
IIRC it's a few lines of code in each of
well,
kernel binaries are different for terminals and cpu servers, but these are
built from the same source code.
in reality the kernel is the same modulo some drivers and one variable ( e.g.
no vga in cpu servers).
-Steve
> On 19 Dec 2014, at 03:15, da Tyga wrote:
>
> Plan9 kernel is m
