[9fans] Hack font for plan9

2016-11-15 Thread Chris McGee
Hi All, I have converted the open source font called Hack to plan 9 font format. It's designed to render source code and is working well for me. https://github.com/sirnewton01/plan9-font-hack/releases I used the this tool to convert it. https://github.com/sirnewton01/ttf2plan9 I hope that the

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread James A. Robinson
That sounds *very* useful. Thank you! I had 9atom installed, but was planning to try out 9front next (probably this weekend). Jim On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM wrote: > you might take a look at 9front devtls and libsec. it does support > tls1.1 and tls1.2. including ecdsa, ecdhe, both vari

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread cinap_lenrek
you might take a look at 9front devtls and libsec. it does support tls1.1 and tls1.2. including ecdsa, ecdhe, both variants of chacha20-poly1305 and aes-gcm aead ciphers suits... i updated drawterm with the code and try to keep it in sync and should not be too difficult to port back to labs plan9.

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread cinap_lenrek
> Is this the reason that it is actually possible to boot a combined > auth/cpu/file server at all? no. the reason this works is that the fileserver and authserver share the same key (authid and password) so factotum can make up auth tickets using the key it already knows, skipping the authenticat

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread Stanley Lieber
Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen wrote: >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: > >> "James A. Robinson" wrote: >> >> >So in a canonical installation the auth server mounts its root from >the >> >file server? >> > >> >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Stanley Lieber >wrote: >> > >> >> The

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Stanley Lieber wrote: > "James A. Robinson" wrote: > > >So in a canonical installation the auth server mounts its root from the > >file server? > > > >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Stanley Lieber wrote: > > > >> The idea is that there is one file system share

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread James A. Robinson
Ah, ok. I'll try that. Thank you! On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:05 AM Stanley Lieber wrote: > "James A. Robinson" wrote: > > >So in a canonical installation the auth server mounts its root from the > >file server? > > > >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Stanley Lieber wrote: > > > >> The idea

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread Stanley Lieber
"James A. Robinson" wrote: >So in a canonical installation the auth server mounts its root from the >file server? > >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Stanley Lieber wrote: > >> The idea is that there is one file system shared by all the >neighboring >> systems. The canonical Plan 9 installation

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread James A. Robinson
So in a canonical installation the auth server mounts its root from the file server? On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:47 AM Stanley Lieber wrote: > The idea is that there is one file system shared by all the neighboring > systems. The canonical Plan 9 installation comprises one disk file server > and

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread Stanley Lieber
"James A. Robinson" wrote: >Folks, > >For a multi-machine network of Plan 9 services, would it be >normal to have an authsrv machine that only runs that service, >and uses a standalone local filesystem, and then have a separate >server running dns+dhcp+tftp to PXE boot client machines. The >latt

Re: [9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread Steve Simon
I have a single cpu/auth/dns/dhcp/tftp/file server. and a raspberry pi terminal. The obvious change would be to add a seperate raspberry pi as an auth server, booting off its own sdcard (if memory serves, the auth server needs to be up first). If I were to do this I would probably make it backup

[9fans] Maintenance of an auth server files vs a dns+dhcp+tftp server

2016-11-15 Thread James A. Robinson
Folks, For a multi-machine network of Plan 9 services, would it be normal to have an authsrv machine that only runs that service, and uses a standalone local filesystem, and then have a separate server running dns+dhcp+tftp to PXE boot client machines. The latter would be backed by a 3rd machine

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread Steve Simon
Sorry, I don't have a 9front so I don't know. -Steve

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread Steve Simon
> The libsec-chacha.diff patch is not useful, since it's not used yet. I suspected as much but thought it wouldn't hurt. > Does it works when you connect to https://9p.io/? > This machine have the same patches applied. yes, this works fine. I am trying to connect to davmail - an exchange / imap

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread Steve Simon
> Just to be sure. Have you rebuilt libsec as well? yep. Wireshark sees TLS 1.2 packets from plan9 so I have that much right... -Steve

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread David du Colombier
> and rebuild my kernel and upas (where I need TLS1.2). Just to be sure. Have you rebuilt libsec as well? -- David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread David du Colombier
> I am trying to get tls 1.2 working on a labs build of plan9. > > What is most infuriating is I am sure I did this a few years ago but I cannot > remember > how (or even if) I got it working. > > what I have done is to install the following patches from 9legacy: > > libsec-chacha.diff

Re: [9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread hiro
does it happen on 9front?

[9fans] tls 1.2

2016-11-15 Thread Steve Simon
Hi, I am trying to get tls 1.2 working on a labs build of plan9. What is most infuriating is I am sure I did this a few years ago but I cannot remember how (or even if) I got it working. what I have done is to install the following patches from 9legacy: libsec-chacha.diff