For future reference, please email cont...@p9f.org if you have any
questions for Plan 9 Foundation.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:49 AM Dan Cross wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:44 PM Anonymous AWK fan via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
> wrote:
>> > This text was generated by the GPT3 text
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:44 PM Anonymous AWK fan via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
wrote:
> > This text was generated by the GPT3 text generator using all licensing
> related threads in 9fans as input.
>
> No it wasn't.
>
> I'm concerned because only one contributor (Nokia) transferred copyright
> of
> This text was generated by the GPT3 text generator using all licensing
> related threads in 9fans as input.
No it wasn't.
I'm concerned because only one contributor (Nokia) transferred copyright
of their contributions to the P9F which were then re-licensed,
but everyone seems to think this
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, at 3:24 AM, Anonymous AWK fan via 9fans wrote:
> I believe if Nokia published a Lucent Public License Version 2 which
> was identical to the P9F MIT license that would fully resolve the
> issue of re-licensing of contributions because the LPL v1.02 allows
> re-licensing to
I believe if Nokia published a Lucent Public License Version 2 which
was identical to the P9F MIT license that would fully resolve the
issue of re-licensing of contributions because the LPL v1.02 allows
re-licensing to later versions of the LPL.
Anonymous AWK fan
