Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Conor Williams
lot's of good stuff there /c:ta On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 9:57 PM Stuart Morrow wrote: > On 04/09/2021, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway. > > mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple > > plan9, given that /dev/mouse

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Stuart Morrow
On 04/09/2021, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway. > mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple > plan9, given that /dev/mouse is already network transparent. I can't think how Plan 9 would work as a server (as in, the machi

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread hiro
it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway. mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple plan9, given that /dev/mouse is already network transparent. also, when you want other systems, with drawterm the /dev/mouse of the alien OS window is already made available. sho

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Steve Simon
i was going to mention barrier but couldn’t remember it’s name. as far as the plan9 code goes they should both work - the only difference being the initial handshake message. current synergy supports many new features but plan9 is not interested. the problem is really the lack of documentatio

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Michael Misch
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier > On Sep 4, 2021, at 9:19 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >  >> >> i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a >> current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc. > > the guy behind synergy at some point tried to convert his

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread hiro
> i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a > current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc. the guy behind synergy at some point tried to convert his free software project into a startup for making money. even before that transition he was a hell to send patches to

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:04 AM Philip Silva via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > > Not sure if it's wasted/duplicate effort but I had been interested in porting > QuickJS (it has ES 2020 support) Eventually I stopped doing this since there > is Duktape (within Netsurf) and Goja now support some

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread ori
Quoth Conor Williams : > anyone got a list/one project to work on... > i'm not too shoddy at the auld porting etc...cw Find something you want to use, and make it work. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Td6b6b3e98268ecde-M

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Steve Simon
i will bite i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc. the biggest pain is the wireshark disector is buggy and there is no real documentation for the protocol. not really selling it am i? -Steve --

Re: [9fans] porting projects...

2021-09-04 Thread Philip Silva via 9fans
Not sure if it's wasted/duplicate effort but I had been interested in porting QuickJS (it has ES 2020 support) Eventually I stopped doing this since there is Duktape (within Netsurf) and Goja now support some of the most common ES6 features. Also my C knowledge/porting experience is quite limite

Re: [9fans] 9hybrid on T61 - work in progress (small beginnings?)

2021-09-04 Thread Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
On 4 September 2021 08:27:21 CEST, Lucio De Re wrote: > The combination of (IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad) T60 chassis and T61 mother > board is known as FrankenPad, I learnt since I bought a none too well > refurbished Lenovo T61 7659-CTO laptop for a moderate price. I had > long wished I could get a T61,