I'll add that it takes a special brand of courage to ask "Why has
everything got to be a file" in front of a Plan 9 crowd ;)
The off-track discussions with Daniel were enlightening. I think his
perspective on "NoT" is quite valuable, and has inspired some ideas
since I got back.
ron minnich
I love it when I discover that something down on my todo-list has
already been done, better than I would have, by someone else :)
Very neat tool, I'll be using it soon.
Dave Eckhardt writes:
>> One thing i did was sometimes to create a skeletron directory
>> tree and bind *before* each single
sirjofri writes:
> 06.03.2024 11:36:39 Edouard Klein :
>
...
>>
>> I'll try to compile it on Linux and will let you know :)
>
> Well, it's designed for plan 9 systems, so you're probably out of luck on
> linux, except you try it with plan9ports.
>
That was th
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-) My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here:
> http://txtpunk.com/finger/index.html
>
> I think we've got enough interoperable unicode-aware implementations we can
>
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> writes:
> all this makes sense. thank you.
> i might be dense, but what's the problem with inetd exactly?
>
I have two main gripes with it:
- it runs as root, in order to switch users when launching a server, and
therefore is a security risk.
- it can be configured only
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-)
Indeed, it may be why I can't seem to find a good, standard
implementation: there are as many implementations as servers.
> My tcp79 comes from my implementation,
sirjofri writes:
> Hi,
>
> 05.03.2024 22:38:59 Edouard Klein :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your answer.
>>
>>
>> sirjofri writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/mach
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
sirjofri writes:
> Hello,
>
> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
> instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or my own
> scripts:
I assume that you then bind-mount /cfg/machinename/service to that
Dear 9fans,
Those of you who run a Plan 9 or Inferno box, could you please share the
contents of your /rc/bin/service or /dis/svc dir ?
I'm writing about Plan 9's listen, and I've read the scripts included in
the default distribution (e.g.
the IWP9 review.
Cheers,
Edouard.
Edouard Klein writes:
> For the record here is the lkml post
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/10/28/155
> Edouard Klein writes:
>
>> Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
>>
>> It seems that Linux does no
I, for one, will attend, barring any incident.
I will send my submission in a frenzy panic minutes before the deadline,
as one usually does.
"Don A. Bailey" writes:
> Last I checked (you) were asking for people to sign up. What’s the actual
> attendee count at this point?
>
>
>> On Jan 25,
For the record here is the lkml post
https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/10/28/155
Edouard Klein writes:
> Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
>
> It seems that Linux does not see 9p as been safe to mount without
> privilege. From what I underst
Thanks Ori for the update. Please do not hesitate if you feel I can make
myself useful somehow.
o...@eigenstate.org writes:
> Quoth Edouard Klein :
>> Dear 9fans,
>>
>> I tried emailing an abstract to all iwp9*@iwp9.org addresses, but got a
>> email delivery failure
Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
It seems that Linux does not see 9p as been safe to mount without
privilege. From what I understand, only FS with the FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag
can be mounted in a user namespace. It seems that v9fs is not one of
them:
For example, tmpfs is
Dear 9fans,
I'm trying to mount a 9p filesystem under a Linux user "namespace".
Apparently this is verboten, because mounting filesystems is dangerous.
So only fuse is permitted inside a user namespace.
I've tried
- using a setuid binary: does not work inside the user namespace,
- 9pfuse and
Dear 9fans,
I tried emailing an abstract to all iwp9*@iwp9.org addresses, but got a
email delivery failure notification back.
Do anybody know where we stand on the workshop organization ? Is there
anything I could do to help ?
Cheers,
Edouard.
--
9fans:
16 matches
Mail list logo