Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] [9fans] Why is there no simple equivelent to plan9's pipes on linux?

2021-06-28 Thread lego12239
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:02:54PM -0400, Claude Noël wrote: > Plan 9 pipes: > - can be opened by multiple proccesses > - preserve write boundries > - will cache a single write > - 2 way > - simple to use > > There's not really anything on linux that really compares to this. May be. But what abou

Re: [9fans] Transfer of Plan 9 to the Plan 9 Foundation

2021-03-23 Thread lego12239
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:06:49AM -0700, a...@9srv.net wrote: > We are thrilled to announce that Nokia has transferred the copyright of > Plan 9 to the Plan 9 Foundation. This transfer applies to all of the > Plan 9 from Bell Labs code, from the earliest days through their final > release. Great!

Re: [9fans] [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: linux 9p: uid & gid

2019-06-21 Thread lego12239
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:34:22AM +0300, Oleg wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 05:34:03PM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > 4294967294 probably started off as -2, which some systems used for user > > "nobody" > > Yes. I understand that linux kernel try to keep work in this case and choose > this

Re: [9fans] off topic - a good Git reference

2015-09-30 Thread lego12239
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:18:20PM -0300, Tiago Natel wrote: > is there someone else interested in write a git tool for plan 9 ? May be me. But now i have no time for this :-). -- Неманов Олег (Nemanov Oleg)

Re: [9fans] atexit() & atexitdont()

2014-11-06 Thread lego12239
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:44:30PM -0800, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > i'm wondering if "print" is the right instrument for knowing the order is > right. You are right, but in this case it's irrelevant. The atexit.c source code is pretty disambiguous.