On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:56 AM Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> > Do you mean something like BlackIce II (I'm under RV32I)?
>
> Yes, I have tried various soft cores on BlackIce (including
> one of my own design, for fun); also real silicon HiFive-1.
> So far none of these has had an
I just went through the patch, aside from minor cosmetic
changes, I think it's ready for inclusion into Go 1.7 if
all.bash passes. The author just has to split it up into
CLs and push to Gerrit for review.
On Mar 12, 2015 12:52 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
so an interesting problem i run into from time to time is separately
computing
the files added to and deleted from a directory in a shell script. uniq
doesn't
work for this. certainly one can loop over two lists of files
On Mar 10, 2015 6:37 PM, Ryan Gonzalez rym...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant reading ELF files, not writing them. Last time I tried with
ken-cc, it didn't work.
But I didn't realize Go removed the C compilers. Do you know why?
Because Go runtime is now implemented in Go and assembly, not a
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:27 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
am i reading the intel docs wrong, or is 6l missing a valid
instruction?
memmove5: doasm: notfound from=12 to=92 (47)CMOVQNE
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:27 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net
wrote:
am i reading the intel docs wrong, or is 6l missing a valid instruction?
memmove5: doasm: notfound from=12 to=92 (47)CMOVQNE DX,(DI)
Go's liblink (which is derived from [5869]l) and cmd/6a support this
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Andrés Domínguez andres...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has someone run successfully the teg2 port on qemu-system-arm?
I don't think qemu-system-arm supports the tegra2 platform.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Andrés Domínguez andres...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-12-23 0:39 GMT+01:00 minux minux...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Andrés Domínguez andres...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has someone run successfully the teg2 port on qemu-system-arm?
I don't think qemu
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:53 AM, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
which also contains a suggested patch
Did you check that the proposed patch actually works?
I see no difference between:
a || b
and
a || (a b) which is (a || a) (a || b)
a || (a b) is actually just a
On Nov 30, 2014 3:10 PM, Mats Olsson plan9@gmail.com wrote:
Just googled and found: https://code.google.com/p/go-wiki/wiki/GoArm
So it seems that it's supported.
go on arm only supports Linux, Freebsd, Netbsd, nacl and Darwin
(unofficial).
plan 9 is not on the list (yet).
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ryan Gonzalez rym...@gmail.com wrote:
I Google'd it, but I didn't find anything. Does it build?
If you stub out a lot of unsupported stuff from lib9, it should build and work.
For example, Go (gc) toolchain uses a modified lib9 and libbio on Windows,
and it's
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:42 PM, arisawa aris...@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp wrote:
rc(1) says:
rfork [nNeEsfFm]
Become a new process group using rfork(flags) where
flags is composed of the bitwise OR of the rfork flags
specified by the option
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Skip Tavakkolian
skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com wrote:
they're well made, priced right, and fast (e.g. compiling Go on linux on rpi
is *very* slow when compared with older odroid-u2 with the same config).
the problem is that samsung doesn't publish the datasheet for
On Nov 17, 2014 9:29 PM, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
I don't know about Go (the Go guys are probably already
suffering from a massive VCS fatigue), but if you want to play
with this idea, there is venti! Vac can take a previous score
to do incremental archiving. If you add sepcial
On Nov 13, 2014 2:25 PM, Skip Tavakkolian skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com
wrote:
- in order to run go built for plan9/386 on 9vx, presumably go should be
built without support for SSE2. is there a way to avoid this?
set GO386 to 387 before running all.rc
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Yoann Padioleau p...@fb.com wrote:
0:int - x was not enough for those balancing(?) and promoting thing?
It's enough for type promotion, but you changed the semantics of the
program.
16 matches
Mail list logo
