Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-18 Thread erik quanstrom
FWIW there is another weirdness of windows, the windows DHCP server doesn't communicate with the DNS server on windows, it expects the client to send an Inform packet to the DHCP server telling it of the clients chosen name. i guess that's the great thing about standards — there are so many to

[9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
Hi! I'm trying to set up an application(don't ask :) ) on my LAN that more-or-less requires the ability to perform dynamic updates of DNS. I'm currently using a Plan 9 system to serve DNS, but DHCP is being served by a FreeBSD machine (because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
(because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9 hosts). What info did your hosts need that Plan 9's dhcpd didn't supply?

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
(because it supplies the correct info for non-Plan 9 hosts). What info did your hosts need that Plan 9's dhcpd didn't supply? Specifically, Plan 9's dhcpd does not supply a context-specific DNS suffix (ie, default domain name), which Windows systems need in order to resolve hosts by short

Re: [9fans] DNS dynamic update

2010-03-17 Thread Steve Simon
It looks from my reading from of dhcpd.c that you could just tweek windows (the registry I assume) and make windows ask for the domain, in which case dhcpd should supply it. If you hate this idea then I think the change to add windows specific dhcp options would be easy - there is already a