On 2014-03-20, 1950, Szymon Olewniczak wrote:
Hi,
I've just published a Summer of Code proposal for Replace language for
wikifs.[1] What do you think about my candidature. Maybe should I explain
something more?
BR,
Szymon
Hi,
I've just published a Summer of Code proposal for Replace language for
wikifs.[1] What do you think about my candidature. Maybe should I explain
something more?
BR,
Szymon
[1]https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/student/google/gsoc2014/hafron/5629499534213120
Greetings,
I am a student interested in participating in GSoC under Plan 9. My
project would involve writing a new window manager as an alternative to rio:
http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/alternative_window_system/index.html
I thought I'd say a few words informally as my proposal
We already have a lot of hacks to make rio tiling.
In my opinion the most interesting/worthwhile
projects mentioned on that wiki is to make things
touchscreen friendly.
2014-03-19 9:36 GMT+01:00 Caleb Malchik cmalc...@gmail.com:
Greetings,
I am a student interested in participating in GSoC
Cohesive compilation of hacks?
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Bence Fábián beg...@gmail.com wrote:
We already have a lot of hacks to make rio tiling.
In my opinion the most interesting/worthwhile
projects mentioned on that wiki is to make things
touchscreen friendly.
2014-03-19 9:36
It would be nice to have something like old Oberon OS had; I think acme was
inspired in part by it (I may be wrong).
Some time ago, I had some ideas on windowing design; were anyone
interested, they're here:
http/www.gli.cas.cz/home/cejchan/plan9/newUI.pdf
What did old Oberon have?
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
On Wed Mar 19 10:14:26 EDT 2014, ara...@mgk.ro wrote:
What did old Oberon have?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(operating_system)
- erik
I think Plan B / Octopus's omero does these things already. I'm still
voting for touch interface
2014-03-19 15:17 GMT+01:00, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
On Wed Mar 19 10:14:26 EDT 2014, ara...@mgk.ro wrote:
What did old Oberon have?
On Wed Mar 19 11:01:54 EDT 2014, beg...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Plan B / Octopus's omero does these things already. I'm still
voting for touch interface
we don't drive any touch hardware, so in the interest of success, i would
not be interested in a gsoc project that required as step 0:
we don't drive any touch hardware, so in the interest of
success, i would not be interested in a gsoc project that
required as step 0: identify, purchase and write driver for
enabling hardware.
If someone were interested in doing this in the short term,
the best option is likely tying it to
On Wed Mar 19 11:33:58 EDT 2014, a...@9srv.net wrote:
I'm still voting for touch interface
Not to be pedantic, but note that there isn't any voting
here. Students come up with a proposal for something
they'd be interested in working on for the summer, and
the prospective mentors order
I'm still voting for touch interface
Not to be pedantic, but note that there isn't any voting
here. Students come up with a proposal for something
they'd be interested in working on for the summer, and
the prospective mentors order them and fill however
many slots we get (short version). I'd
On Wed Mar 19 11:36:39 EDT 2014, a...@9srv.net wrote:
we don't drive any touch hardware, so in the interest of
success, i would not be interested in a gsoc project that
required as step 0: identify, purchase and write driver for
enabling hardware.
If someone were interested in doing
given that that port was done many releases of ios ago, it
is likly that a different step 0 would be required: bring
the ios drawterm port back to life.
Certainly. It doesn't currently build. Old binaries start up but
quickly crash. From memory, I don't believe keyboard input
currently works.
Hello 9fans, I'm applying to the Plan 9 GSoC again this year.
I propose to continue work on the HTML5 drawterm I started in last
year's GSoC, in the hope of making it a usable alternative to the
native drawterm.
I have identified three major areas for improvement:
* cleaning up and fixing bugs
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:17 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
On Wed Mar 19 10:14:26 EDT 2014, ara...@mgk.ro wrote:
What did old Oberon have?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(operating_system)
- erik
Yes, I know what Oberon is, I even used it. Peter mentioned something
On Mar 19, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Anthony Sorace a...@9srv.net wrote:
given that that port was done many releases of ios ago, it
is likly that a different step 0 would be required: bring
the ios drawterm port back to life.
Certainly. It doesn't currently build. Old binaries start up but
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 04:36:34 EDT Caleb Malchik cmalc...@gmail.com wrote:
For my project, I would build a tiling window manager similar to dwm
(what I use on Linux). I think a dwm-style interface that could be
controlled from the keyboard would provide a nice contrast to what we
already have
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, David Hoskin r...@davidrhoskin.com wrote:
Hello 9fans, I'm applying to the Plan 9 GSoC again this year.
I propose to continue work on the HTML5 drawterm I started in last
year's GSoC, in the hope of making it a usable alternative to the
native drawterm.
I
Multiple displays and display dpi awareness in acme would make my day!
Multi-display looks easy - we just need handling for adding a new row,
which is already handily abstracted.
Fitt's law aware mouse movement would be nice too, particularly on large
screens. You could slightly trap the mouse
On 11 March 2014 08:39, tuchalia tucha...@gmail.com wrote:
If it isn't, I may still be interested on working on Access to host's
devices**, so where can I start looking with that?
The old way way was to add an internal virtual device to Inferno's emu or
9vx or drawterm.
I think the best way
[3]. Should avoid the patent issue of the K42 system.
[Yan] For this problem, I do not have any idea right now. Do we need to
propose a different solution (from K42's MCS lock), but solve the same
problem (do not need to pass node data structure in the parameter)?
of course the simplist
Dear all,
I have noticed the comments of Anthony Sorace and Quanstro in my GSOC
proposal. Thanks very much! Basically, there are three problems.
[1]. The timeline has the time of reading related documents and source
codes, but Anthony thinks it should be solved before the coding stage.
[Yan]
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to get to work on the Ventilator project during the GSoC, and in
order to have a good proposal I'm asking for some information here.
Where should I start looking?
Also, I have just seen this:
http://www.vitanuova.com/inferno/man/2/venti.html
Is it still possible to get
This is really too late for the GSoC bits. But possibly of interests for later
developments...
On Mar 25, 2010, at 6:03 AM, yy wrote:
Would such a project be interesting for this year gsoc? Is any mentor
interested in Forth?
I really think acme would make a great environment for Forth
2009/3/28 Bruce Ellis bruce.el...@gmail.com:
Just a suggestion,
A good forth system using acme, probably based on fgb's 4th. The goal
is to conquer the Seaforth chip.
I know the dev kit is US$500 but their compiler and simulator, written
in forth, doesn't need hardware.
And at least two
Just a suggestion,
A good forth system using acme, probably based on fgb's 4th. The goal
is to conquer the Seaforth chip.
I know the dev kit is US$500 but their compiler and simulator, written
in forth, doesn't need hardware.
And at least two 9fans have a kit.
brucee
28 matches
Mail list logo
