Re: [9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality,

2016-04-07 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sun Apr 3 01:16:15 PDT 2016, 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote: > > If a member of Mensa (whose IQ must be at or above the 98th > > percentile) can mistake social media for reaility, then that same > > mistake can be (and most certainly is) made by the other 98% of the > > population. > > intelligence

Re: [9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality, WAS: Re: The Plan 9/"right" way to do Facebook

2016-04-04 Thread Winston Kodogo
Alas, I can make absolutely no sense of anything from the cigarmeister. But then again an inability to tell what's true at all could be an emerging trajedy of these commons. Or perhaps there is some creative merit in this. Where is Boyd when you need him? On 4 April 2016 at 23:37, hiro

Re: [9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality, WAS: Re: The Plan 9/"right" way to do Facebook

2016-04-04 Thread hiro
here at my university mensa is just the place where the food tastes the worst.

Re: [9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality, WAS: Re: The Plan 9/"right" way to do Facebook

2016-04-03 Thread Wes Kussmaul
On 04/02/2016 10:30 PM, cigar562hfsp952f...@icebubble.org wrote: That's one of the reasons why it's so important to maintain control and ownership of OUR OWN data. My data + my programs = my image of reality. This went out Friday... THOUSANDS TRAPPED IN MINING DISASTER While exact

Re: [9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality,

2016-04-03 Thread Richard Miller
> If a member of Mensa (whose IQ must be at or above the 98th > percentile) can mistake social media for reaility, then that same > mistake can be (and most certainly is) made by the other 98% of the > population. intelligence != wisdom skill at solving IQ tests != intelligence

[9fans] OT: Ubiquitous data vs. Reality, WAS: Re: The Plan 9/"right" way to do Facebook

2016-04-02 Thread cigar562hfsp952fans
Giacomo Tesio writes: > physical tool. Now, we "know that a programmable computer is no more and no > less than an extremely handy device for realizing any conceivable mechanism > without changing a single wire", but are we sure we really want to remove > the awareness of the