Now I'm so tempted to get a stack of Raspberry Pi 3 and this case:
https://www.amazon.com/GeauxRobot-Raspberry-Model-6-layer-Enclosure/dp/B01D9130QC/ref=sr_1_32
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:53 AM Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> Getting Plan 9 to boot on the pi3 (in 32-bit mode) was alm
The 32-bit subset of ARMv8 is (supposedly) better specified at the system
level than ARMv7
(ie, by the v8 architecture itself).
There are some cores that do just the 32-bit subset of v8, but apparently
Cortex-A53 will do 64 as well,
which I hadn't realised from the Rpi3 announcement I saw.
On 3 M
>> cpu0: 1200MHz ARM Cortex-A53 r0p4
>
> it's ARMv8-A!
When booted in 32-bit mode, it behaves like armv7a.
On 3 March 2016 at 14:50, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> cpu0: 1200MHz ARM Cortex-A53 r0p4
it's ARMv8-A!
On 3 March 2016 at 14:50, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> requires three new
> instructions that 5a doesn't know about ...
>
Possibly. I added some of the control instructions where there was
consistency in definition
and they were needed more than once.
Getting Plan 9 to boot on the pi3 (in 32-bit mode) was almost trivial.
Plan 9 from Bell Labs
board rev: 0xa02082 firmware rev: 1456410415
cpu0: 1200MHz ARM Cortex-A53 r0p4
fp: 32 registers, simd
fp: arm arch VFPv3+ with null subarch; rev 4
eMMC exte
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016, at 02:40 PM, Richard Miller wrote:
> >> Incidentally I can confirm that the Raspberry Pi Zero runs Plan 9
> >> happily.
> >
> > Very nice to know that Richard. Is the image and the code available
> > somewhere?
>
> The normal 9pi image runs on the zero too.
Thank you. PiZero
>> Incidentally I can confirm that the Raspberry Pi Zero runs Plan 9
>> happily.
>
> Very nice to know that Richard. Is the image and the code available
> somewhere?
The normal 9pi image runs on the zero too.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, at 01:58 AM, Richard Miller wrote:
>
> Incidentally I can confirm that the Raspberry Pi Zero runs Plan 9
> happily.
Very nice to know that Richard. Is the image and the code available
somewhere?
--
Ramakrishnan
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Mark Lee Smith wrote:
> What about NetBSD drivers?
What about them? NetBSD doesn't support the Pi3. What drivers do
we want anyway?
> As I understand it the Rump project provides a clean way to run
> NetBSD drivers in different environments. I guess the bigger pr
What about NetBSD drivers? As I understand it the Rump project provides a
clean way to run NetBSD drivers in different environments. I guess the
bigger problem here is be getting them past the compiler?
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, 22:48 erik quanstrom, wrote:
> > 10-12 years ago FreeBSD had "project Ev
> 10-12 years ago FreeBSD had "project Evil" for an NDIS shim
> layer that allowed use of windows network drivers on FreeBSD.
> Has anyone considered writing a shim that allows use of a
> FreeBSD driver with plan9?
i looked at that a bit, and was not convinced that the surface area was
manageable
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:28:04 GMT Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> > Now that RPI3 is generally available, I'm wondering if there are any
> > efforts underway to port Plan 9 to it.
>
> "Underway" might be a bit ambitious since it was only announced today.
> I've ordered one to have a pl
> Now that RPI3 is generally available, I'm wondering if there are any
> efforts underway to port Plan 9 to it.
"Underway" might be a bit ambitious since it was only announced today.
I've ordered one to have a play with.
> I would like to help in any way I
> can.
Finding a programming manual for
Now that RPI3 is generally available, I'm wondering if there are any
efforts underway to port Plan 9 to it. I would like to help in any way I
can.
-Skip
15 matches
Mail list logo
