Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-12 Thread Venkatesh Srinivas
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:07:48PM +0100, Uriel wrote: Oh, glad that somebody found my partial git port useful, I might give it another push some time. Having a git/hg repo of the plan9 history is something I have been thinking about for a while, really cool that you got something going

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-11 Thread Uriel
Oh, glad that somebody found my partial git port useful, I might give it another push some time. Having a git/hg repo of the plan9 history is something I have been thinking about for a while, really cool that you got something going already. Will you provide a standard git web interface (and a

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-11 Thread Venkatesh Srinivas
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:07:48PM +0100, Uriel wrote: Oh, glad that somebody found my partial git port useful, I might give it another push some time. Having a git/hg repo of the plan9 history is something I have been thinking about for a while, really cool that you got something going

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-11 Thread Roman V. Shaposhnik
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:19 -0500, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 07:07:48PM +0100, Uriel wrote: Oh, glad that somebody found my partial git port useful, I might give it another push some time. Having a git/hg repo of the plan9 history is something I have been thinking

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-11 Thread Nathaniel W Filardo
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:35:33AM -0800, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: Since its a more or less r/o Git repo, why not also provide a mirror on one of these guys: http://github.com/ http://repo.or.cz/ http://gitorious.org/ I don't want to make it even that official yet, in case

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-11 Thread Roman V. Shaposhnik
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 20:43 -0500, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: Incidentally, a git repository of the crawls, from 2002/1212 to 2009/0205, is available at http://mirrors.acm.jhu.edu/trees/plan9native/ . Git gets the data down to 165M after a gc run, so perhaps it's a better idea than a

[9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-10 Thread Nathaniel W Filardo
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:45:43PM -0800, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 17:28 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: what leads you to beleve that that amount of sharing will be significant? Just a hunch so far. I don't have hard data to prove anything. On the other hand, I'd be

Re: [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back)

2009-02-10 Thread erik quanstrom
(240 MB actual storage in Venti). (With no sharing whatsoever, this would be approx. 310 GB.) I would like to re-archive this with the Rabin fingerprinting vac for comparison. by no sharing do you mean if each file tree were stored in a seperate fs, or do you mean that the original fs + one