On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:17:54 +0100
Mathieu Lonjaret wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
> wrote:
>
> > I now use Plan 9 for everything that does not involve 3D graphics, the
> > www, or email. The latter is because as far as I'm aware there's no way
> > to get a thread
Τη Τετάρτη, 14 Μαρτίου 2012 10:08:57 μ.μ. UTC+1, ο χρήστης Paschke Christoph
έγραψε:
> for me very interesting question:
>
> who use a Plan 9 system productive?
> who use it for research?
> who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
> who use it commercial in a business?
> who
On 3/14/2012 4:08 PM, Paschke Christoph wrote:
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
who use it for research?
who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
who use it commercial in a business?
who use it on an embedded device?
who programs with li
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
> I now use Plan 9 for everything that does not involve 3D graphics, the
> www, or email. The latter is because as far as I'm aware there's no way
> to get a threaded message view.
I don't think it would be much effort to address that p
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:08:57 +0100
Paschke Christoph wrote:
> for me very interesting question:
>
> who use a Plan 9 system productive?
I now use Plan 9 for everything that does not involve 3D graphics, the
www, or email. The latter is because as far as I'm aware there's no way
to get a threaded
Nothing.
some of us.
--
- Yaroslav
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
who use it for research?
who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
who use it commercial in a business?
who use it on an embedded device?
who programs with limbo?
what else?
