In practical terms this doesn't make a lot of difference for Plan 9 as it is
now. Dev/draw makes use
of only a few simple 2d operations for accelerated graphics, and the dma
engine on the raspberry pi
SoC provides a 2d memory-to-memory mode which should be sufficient to do these
on the ARM
I don't see any problem with having to talk to invisible firmware.
Surely that's normal for devices with firmware?
In this case, it seems even better for Plan 9, because the OpenGL/ES engine
is in the firmware,
so we don't need to write or port one, just talk to an existing one.
It's similar
Good !
2012/10/24 Scott Elcomb pse...@gmail.com
Hi all,
For those working on Plan9 for the Pi, userland is now completely open
source: http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
I need more Pi =D
Best regards,
--
Scott Elcomb
@psema4 on Twitter / Identi.ca / Github more
Atomic
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org
http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
Well, they are lying to everyone.
Their open source is nothing but a layer of code which calls into a
closed source back-end.
Le 24/10/2012 20:03, s...@9front.org a écrit :
From: Theo de Raadtdera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org
http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
Well, they are lying to everyone.
Their open source is nothing but a layer of code which calls into a
closed source back-end.
term% theo
Come on.. stop making assumptions.
--
cinap
its true, if you read the forum fully...
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:49 PM, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote:
term% theo
Come on.. stop making assumptions.
--
cinap
