On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:44 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> It had to happen:
> System and method for accessing SMASH-CLP commands as a web service
> United States Patent Application 20080016143
Oh there's absolutely no prior art there ... in the namespace thing.
I think I'm going to patent patenti
It had to happen:
System and method for accessing SMASH-CLP commands as a web service
United States Patent Application 20080016143
ron
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Uriel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:27 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
> > On 8/13/09, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >>> we don't use te*xt for 9p, do we?
> >>
> >> the difference being, 9p is the transport not
> >> the representation of the data and 9p has
> >> a fixed
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:42 +0100, roger peppe wrote:
> 2009/8/13 Roman Shaposhnik :
> > Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
> > of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
> > been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
> > are really quit
I have not been able to convince coworkers that filesystem namespaces
are the way to go. I think they think it is too hard.
*shrug* you can lead a horse...
Funny, the problem I usually have is that people think file systems
are *too simple*, oh, no data types other than *byte stream*
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Uriel wrote:
> The software industry is the ultimate recreation of Sisyphus' curse.
>
> uriel
>
There's really no point in worrying about that.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:27 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
> On 8/13/09, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> we don't use te*xt for 9p, do we?
>>
>> the difference being, 9p is the transport not
>> the representation of the data and 9p has
>> a fixed set of messages.
>>
>
> Also 9p aims at file systems pretty o
2009/8/13 David Leimbach :
> On 8/13/09, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> we don't use te*xt for 9p, do we?
>>
>> the difference being, 9p is the transport not
>> the representation of the data and 9p has
>> a fixed set of messages.
> Also 9p aims at file systems pretty obviously where Thirft is a
> gene
On 8/13/09, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> we don't use te*xt for 9p, do we?
>
> the difference being, 9p is the transport not
> the representation of the data and 9p has
> a fixed set of messages.
>
Also 9p aims at file systems pretty obviously where Thirft is a
generic RPC mechanism with stub compile
> we don't use text for 9p, do we?
the difference being, 9p is the transport not
the representation of the data and 9p has
a fixed set of messages.
- erik
The software industry is the ultimate recreation of Sisyphus' curse.
uriel
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Daniel Lyons wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
>> if we're going back there, just take me out back and shoot me now.
>> i want to remember some progress in com
2009/8/13 Roman Shaposhnik :
> Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
> of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
> been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
> are really quite good for data serialization in the heterogeneous
> environment
> it all seems to hark back to the days
> mainframers put disk addresses in their data.
Never mind disk addresses. We used to put whole channel programs into
our data. How else would you implement a fast disk search without
bothering the CPU? Just build a self-grepping file ...
On Aug 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
if we're going back there, just take me out back and shoot me now.
i want to remember some progress in computer science.
The principal joy I derive from using Plan 9 (and I am quite new) is
that it is so well architected. By day I am a web
On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Tim Newsham wrote:
Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
are really quite good for data serialization in the heterogeneous
> Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
> of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
> been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
> are really quite good for data serialization in the heterogeneous
> environments (especially when they are c
Am I totally missing something or hasn't been the binary RPC
of that style been dead ever since SUNRPC? Hasn't the eulogy
been delivered by CORBA? Haven't folks realized that S-exprs
are really quite good for data serialization in the heterogeneous
environments (especially when they are called JSO
I've just been enlightened by a friend of mine who explained
to me that binary RPC is still alive and kicking:
http://incubator.apache.org/thrift/
http://incubator.apache.org/thrift/static/thrift-20070401.pdf
and, of course, nothing in CS is complete these days unless
there's somebody at
18 matches
Mail list logo
