On 07/ 7/10 04:13 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
On Tue Jul 6 21:15:59 EDT 2010, mirtchov...@gmail.com wrote:
What property?
zfs, i presume?
erik, i care about zfs, tell me more.
speaking as a private citizen with no insider
knowledge in this case
i think it should be obvious to any
While there really isn't anything other than what's on our web site to say, I
can say that the Open Solaris NAS is important but not a requirement for
Coraid's success. We are not doomed.
Brantley
On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:19 PM, EBo wrote:
clearly, coraid won't send commandos to make sure
Please don't comment on the case at all.
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:13 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
On Tue Jul 6 21:15:59 EDT 2010, mirtchov...@gmail.com wrote:
What property?
zfs, i presume?
erik, i care about zfs, tell me more.
speaking as a private citizen with no insider
knowledge in
I'm more interested in what this means for Coraid? If Oracle buckles
under then zfs ports to Linux et al. is doomed.
It's unlikely Oracle will buckle, although it's theoretically possible
they'll lose. That would uphold NetApp's patents and potentially make
the use of ZFS illegal without
It's unlikely Oracle will buckle, although it's theoretically possible
they'll lose. That would uphold NetApp's patents and potentially make
the use of ZFS illegal without a license from NetApp.
From what they said they have prior art, so that should shoot it down
pretty quick.
Coraid's
Ah... I was referring to ZFS not Coraid. I doubted that Coraid would see
this as more than a bump in the road, but thought I would ask.
While there really isn't anything other than what's on our web site to
say, I can say that the Open Solaris NAS is important but not a
requirement
for
Please don't comment on the case at all.
oops... sorry. reading the email back to front.
albeit not in the good news:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/06/netapp_coraid/
(sorry about the source, those who dislike ElReg)
The Article said:
It might say that, faced with someone using its stolen property supplied by a
third party, Oracle-Sun, with whom it is in a legal dispute, what is it
expected to do?
What property?
pgpdL3ak3SHFd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
What property?
zfs, i presume?
erik, i care about zfs, tell me more.
On Tue Jul 6 21:15:59 EDT 2010, mirtchov...@gmail.com wrote:
What property?
zfs, i presume?
erik, i care about zfs, tell me more.
speaking as a private citizen with no insider
knowledge in this case
i think it should be obvious to any vaguely careful
thinker that there is no stolen
clearly, coraid won't send commandos to make sure that you don't use zfs
with coraid storage.
If they do, will they be from outer space?
-- vs
clearly, coraid won't send commandos to make sure that you don't use
zfs
with coraid storage.
If they do, will they be from outer space?
How did we get from paralegal to paratroopers?
I'm more interested in what this means for Coraid? If Oracle buckles
under then zfs ports to Linux et al.
13 matches
Mail list logo
