> The following is all hypothetical. I'm curious about how people
> think auth(2)/factotum(4) could be adapted to support the use
> case ...
>
> factotum was intended to handle the authentication dance on behalf
> of network apps. But in the case of things like IMAP, it really
> just stores the
i'd like to see the auth server do more of the work.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T8154f8e7b95f1a8c-M269a6e45351ce1fc554237ae
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
And work under p9p. Me too! Plug in a proper X-based WM and I can get
some performance out of my rather dated equipment again.
Lucio.
On 1/24/20, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> The following is all hypothetical. I'm curious about how people
> think auth(2)/factotum(4) could be adapted to support
The following is all hypothetical. I'm curious about how people
think auth(2)/factotum(4) could be adapted to support the use
case ...
factotum was intended to handle the authentication dance on behalf
of network apps. But in the case of things like IMAP, it really
just stores the client's
