Re: [9fans] ports duplication

2010-03-08 Thread Iruata Souza
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:26 AM, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote: As for the smaller things, I would prefer to see ten different bits of code that achieve the same end vs. just one. Diversity is good, and a broader selection of code gives a bigger field to mine for ideas and concepts. I really

[9fans] ports duplication

2010-03-07 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
I really think this idea that duplication of things in contrib is bad, is bad (or just a red herring). For ports of big applications (python, say), the amount of work involved is going to self-limit the number of ports right up front. And the ones that do make it will self-select based on the

Re: [9fans] ports duplication

2010-03-07 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
Augment the contrib tools (or a fork or facsimile thereof) to including user-defined rankings and reviews. Forks and duplication sometimes make sense, sometimes they don't -- but the better versions will percolate to the top. Its a community driven thing, we need the right tools to enable

Re: [9fans] ports duplication

2010-03-07 Thread lucio
As for the smaller things, I would prefer to see ten different bits of code that achieve the same end vs. just one. Diversity is good, and a broader selection of code gives a bigger field to mine for ideas and concepts. I really don't think that's going to be the problem here, we do not have