and the arguments -axww
>
> --
> *From: *"Bruce Ellis" <bruce.el...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM
> *Subject: *[9fans] ps bug
>
> using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun
> I guess.
> brucee
>
>
>
rom: *"Bruce Ellis" <bruce.el...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
*Sent: *Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM
*Subject: *[9fans] ps bug
using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun I
guess.
brucee
ot;Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM
Subject: [9fans] ps bug
using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun I
guess.
brucee
Hmm checked twice
zhilkin@szhilkin:~/Work/Mem> ps ax | wc -l
350
szhilkin@szhilkin:~/Work/Mem> 9 ps -e | wc -l
350
2017-04-11 10:51 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis :
> Doesn't help.
>
> brucee
>
> On 11 April 2017 at 17:21, Sergey Zhilkin wrote:
>
>>
Doesn't help.
brucee
On 11 April 2017 at 17:21, Sergey Zhilkin wrote:
> Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
> do not undarstand +1 parameter.
>
> Try to place plan9port path before any other.
>
> 2017-04-11 9:54 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis
Also, on Linux (OpenSUSE 42.2) i have same output of p9p ps -e and ps ax in
line count
2017-04-11 10:21 GMT+03:00 Sergey Zhilkin :
> Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
> do not undarstand +1 parameter.
>
> Try to place plan9port path
Seems ps (shell script from hell) uses plan9port sort. And coreutils sort
do not undarstand +1 parameter.
Try to place plan9port path before any other.
2017-04-11 9:54 GMT+03:00 Bruce Ellis :
> using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun
> I
using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun I
guess.
brucee