Re: [9fans] startboot signature

2016-02-18 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 17 February 2016 at 08:19, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > Out of curiosity, why the startboot function in port/initcode.c is `void > startboot(char *argv0, char **argv)` given the argv0 is ignored? > > I see that this simplify various main() in init9.s but I wonder why not > simply use `void startboot

[9fans] startboot signature

2016-02-17 Thread Giacomo Tesio
Out of curiosity, why the startboot function in port/initcode.c is `void startboot(char *argv0, char **argv)` given the argv0 is ignored? I see that this simplify various main() in init9.s but I wonder why not simply use `void startboot(char **argv)` Giacomo