On 3 Jun 2008, at 00:29, ron minnich wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Charles Forsyth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
not at all: i meant that
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
OK, let's modify b: a little as follows;
b:
#if JMP 0
jmp bb
#if JMP 1
callb
#if JMP 2
callb
#if JMP 3
callb
#endif
#endif
#endif
#endif
bb:
I'm lost. So the calls never get called--they just
make the jmp
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Charles Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
ron
not at all: i meant that as a description of 8a's algorithm to eliminate
branches
to be more accurate, it's not 8a at all, because 8a is stupid, but 8l does the
work.
i missed that point the first time until i re-read the messages.
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
not at all: i meant that as a description of 8a's algorithm to eliminate
branches
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Charles Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't try this with 8a. 8a is too damn smart
no, it's simply following instructions.
i meant that as praise for 8a if that came across wrong.
not at all: i meant that as a description of 8a's algorithm to eliminate
