% if(! test -e /n/usb) mkdir /n/usb
% mount -c /srv/ext2 /n/usb
mount: mount /n/usb: file does not exist
i think you mean
mount -c /srv/ext2 /n/ext2 /dev/sdXX/$partition
are you correcting the /n/usb to /n/ext2, or the lack of a
spec arg? if the later, at least as per the man page,
Thank you! I works like this:
usb/disk
disk/partfs -m /dev -d sdU0 /n/disk/0/data
disk/fdisk -p /dev/sdU0/data/dev/sdU0/ctl
blk=`{disk/fdisk -p $disk | awk '/^part linux / {print $3}'}
ext2srv -f /n/disk/0/data:$blk usbdisk
mount -c /srv/usbdisk /n/usb /dev/sdU0/linux
I don't know; I didn't know of the existence of any such thing.
Ron just handed me a tarball one day and said, Thou Shalt Port This,
so I did. I'll look at the one on sourceforge.
John
Yep - a basic plan9 version was added to the repo a year or two ago.
I haven't tested it at all though,
i wonder if they'll give the same results!
yes, the results are very similar (it's not an exact number). top here
is the original ftq, bottom is John's port:
http://mirtchovski.com/screenshots/ftq.jpg
btw, John, please add a clean option to the mkfile; also,
exits(success) is wrong.
the only major difference would be between the respective
getticks() and cycles() implementations, i think.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wonder if they'll give the same results!
yes, the results are very similar (it's not an exact number). top here
is
The two upticks on the top one usually mean trouble with the timer. I
can't imagine why it is happening.
missyncronized tsc?
- erik
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:15 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The two upticks on the top one usually mean trouble with the timer. I
can't imagine why it is happening.
missyncronized tsc?
Good possibility, but without knowing what it was run on it's hard to
say. Obviously, we
