hm... wouldnt it just crash if mh->mount is nil?
--
cinap
--- Begin Message ---
> I had a couple of CPU sessions running on it. The most obvious trigger
> seems to have been exportfs, I eventually turned off the stats report
sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel:
/n/sou
On 10/25/10, Joseph Stewart wrote:
> Dave,
>
> The way I see this is two reasonable people working a misunderstanding out.
> There are many contemporary examples of endless mud-slinging with no real
> concern for solving problems or coming to a reasonable conclusion.
>
> Regards,
>
> -joe
>
> On M
Sorry. I really need to throw away this mobile phone and NOT
accidentally hit send in gmail basic.
On 10/25/10, Nick LaForge wrote:
> On 10/25/10, Joseph Stewart wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> The way I see this is two reasonable people working a misunderstanding
>> out.
>> There are many contempor
Dave,
The way I see this is two reasonable people working a misunderstanding out.
There are many contemporary examples of endless mud-slinging with no real
concern for solving problems or coming to a reasonable conclusion.
Regards,
-joe
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
Brantley,
I apologize for my confrontational attitude. It's totally unnecessary, and
I wish that I could take it all back.
You certainly didn't deserve it, and the 9fans aren't deserving the noise
I've caused by my stupid approach to this thread.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Brantley
dave,
no problem. i didn't cut and paste the answer, but i'm very sorry that i gave
that impression. i'm a pretty easygoing guy, a fact that isn't obvious over an
email list. i wasn't irritated by the question at all. the question was a
very good one.
the reason we can't do remote employee
Thank you for answering the question. Let me explain my point of view on
the exchange.
I worked for a company in Birmingham AL for about 6 years from Seattle. I
had Birmingham insurance, Birmingham HR people etc, but I was remote. I
thought perhaps it was not clear if one could be a satellite e
i'm sorry. those who are not in silicon valley or northeast georgia will have
to relocate.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:30 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
> That's actually not an answer but whatever... I guess I don't actually care.
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brantley Coile wrote:
> the posi
That's actually not an answer but whatever... I guess I don't actually care.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brantley Coile wrote:
> the positions are in redwood city, ca and athens, ga.
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
> > Brantley,
> >
> > I'm asking publicly because
the positions are in redwood city, ca and athens, ga.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
> Brantley,
>
> I'm asking publicly because I'm betting it's a FAQ. Do you consider remote
> employees as a possibility, or do you require relocation?
>
> Dave
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 a
Brantley,
I'm asking publicly because I'm betting it's a FAQ. Do you consider remote
employees as a possibility, or do you require relocation?
Dave
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Brantley Coile wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> as most on this list know, coraid makes storage devices that use plan 9 as
http://www.arl-external.com/iwp9-2010/
I've got several talks encoding and uploading now.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> I'm back from travels and have started ripping and encoding the raw
> video from IWP9.
> First talk is done (talks may not be in order) and I'm
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:20:51AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel:
>
> /n/sources/plan9//sys/src/9/port/chan.c:1012,1018 - chan.c:1012,1020
> /*
>* mh->mount->to == c, so
hi guys,
as most on this list know, coraid makes storage devices that use plan 9 as the
software platform. we also use it as our primary development environment. we
still run a ken file server here. plan 9 is fundamental to our vision. coraid
has become a hot silicon valley property and we
> The only bit I don't get is why you have to supply a mountpoint to import.
> Surely import will always be running from listen and as such it will not
> be in any useful namespace so why mount anything?
would it make more sense if it instead said "root of tree to be mounted"?
- erik
> I had a couple of CPU sessions running on it. The most obvious trigger
> seems to have been exportfs, I eventually turned off the stats report
sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel:
/n/sources/plan9//sys/src/9/port/chan.c:1012,1018 - chan.c:1012,1020
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:02:04AM +0200, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will anyone here be attending fOSSa?
> (http://fossa2010.inrialpes.fr/)
> I'm afraid it doesn't look very interesting from a technical pov...
Yes... Quote:
"the second edition of fOSSa conference presents this ph
Hi,
Will anyone here be attending fOSSa?
(http://fossa2010.inrialpes.fr/)
I'm afraid it doesn't look very interesting from a technical pov...
Mathieu
18 matches
Mail list logo
