Re: [9fans] Plan9 development

2010-11-06 Thread dexen deVries
On Saturday 06 of November 2010 03:20:55 Bruce Ellis wrote: i can answer that one easily. that's why it's called mash rather than random marketting name. the intention was to replace plan9 rc with a shell that was maintainable and had loadable modules. i wrote it in limbo to show it works,

[9fans] Auto-rejecting mails

2010-11-06 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
I just tried to mail this list a few minutes ago, but all I got was an auto-rejection. Neither http://mail.9fans.net/listinfo/9fans nor http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/mailing_lists/ mention any subscription requirement, so I assume this is a bug in the 9fans.net listserv. Hope this helps

[9fans] pcc limitation?

2010-11-06 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Hi, any idea why the code below causes an error message from pcc? I'm trying to port flashrom to Plan 9, but I've been fighting the compiler for the last few hours. /usr/glenda/flashrom/test3.c:20[stdin:45] constructor must be a structure /usr/glenda/flashrom/test3.c:25[stdin:50] constructor must

Re: [9fans] pcc limitation?

2010-11-06 Thread Federico G. Benavento
the syntax (){} is for structures, like (Point){0, 0} or something, so you don't need the braces there, just the cast .writearr = (const unsigned char*)JEDEC_WREN, On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, any