As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
since doing the mk's. Obviously something in those builds
In article 784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com,
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be
In article 90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com,
Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Great, 9vx is so
In article 784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com,
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be
From The Organization of Networks in Plan 9:
a. Asynchronous communications channels such as pipes, TCP
conversations, Datakit conversations, and RS232 lines are implemented
using streams.
b. Streams remain in our kernel because we are unable to devise a
better alternative.
Also, in a previous
In article BANLkTi=djiqswgyncojzoopvffkybai...@mail.gmail.com,
ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
that's one of the
I have tweaked the Plan 9 native ar.h to allow for manual adjustment
around the different needs of Go and native Plan 9 toolchains, so now:
#ifndef SARNAME
#define SARNAME 16
#endif
SARNAME can be predefined to the 64 that Go prefers. Unfortunately,
it's a short term
Also, in a previous question (http://groups.google.com/group/
comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/771294cf1d34c337) it was stated
that streams are no longer used. So what's the present mechanism that
replaces streams?
there isn't one. you can't dynamically reconfigure i/o paths in plan 9.
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
that's one of the
PS: I still can't link an executable with the version of 8l from the
Go toolchain that I built under Plan 9, but I'm hoping to get there
soon.
It's of some consolation to me that I see exactly the same results
under Ubuntu, so that particular problem isn't in the 8l executable
created for Plan
In article insdeo$km5$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what
PS: I still can't link an executable with the version of 8l from the
Go toolchain that I built under Plan 9, but I'm hoping to get there
soon.
It's of some consolation to me that I see exactly the same results
under Ubuntu, so that particular problem isn't in the 8l executable
created for
Thanks! All implementations works now.
A typo fix in Go implementation was not enough. You can't write
message by parts, have to form it in buffer before writing.
ratrace helped to find problem with Ruby/Python implementations.
https://gist.github.com/912377#file_ratrace.log shows that both
Even on Plan 9 proper (that is, bare hardware?
how about virtualized on qemu or VMWare, etc.)?
ak
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:49 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, it's me, the repeating person (I almost said broken record but
I'm not sure how many people know what that means any
16 matches
Mail list logo
