Re: [9fans] p9 vhost?
On 10/22/2012 03:19 AM, Don Bailey wrote: Has any progress been made on using plan9 as a virtual machine host? Yes, the xen9 kernel as mentioned on the http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/installing_in_xen_3.0/ page worked fine here under xen 4.0 and 4.1 as well. -- Balwinder S bdheeman Dheeman (http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)
Re: [9fans] p9 vhost?
On 2012-10-22 04:40, Balwinder S Dheeman wrote: On 10/22/2012 03:19 AM, Don Bailey wrote: Has any progress been made on using plan9 as a virtual machine host? Yes, the xen9 kernel as mentioned on the http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/installing_in_xen_3.0/ page worked fine here under xen 4.0 and 4.1 as well. That'd be a virtual machine *guest* you're describing there. The answer for plan9 as a vm host is still 'no.' Please post this, however, in the thread concerning the use of plan9 under Xen4. The OP sure would be interested in your usage under Xen4. -Jack
[9fans] hotels in dublin
has anyone got a reservation yet? it's always more fun when the hotels are close together. - erik
Re: [9fans] Xen4 status
if you're running xen you're almost certainly using a linux in dom0. Given that, kvm is usually a better bet. ron
[9fans] I need some EDID
so, if any of you have X11 running, and could do this: xrandr --verbose and send the output to me, subject EDID I would NOT be forever in your debt, and I will NOT put your name in lights, but I would appreciate it :-) ron
Re: [9fans] Xen4 status
On 22/10/2012 21:20, ron minnich wrote: if you're running xen you're almost certainly using a linux in dom0. Given that, kvm is usually a better bet. Right, dom0 is a Xen3 Debian. OK, but that's strange, I read the opposite advice from you and Eric Van Hensbergen : http://9fans.net/archive/2007/04/152 OK, it's 5 years old... I wasn't aware that qemu/kvm did such progresses... what make this huge difference? On the other hand, since 2009, I tried a lot Plan 9 over qemu+kqemu, then switched to kvm (Intel vmx). Even if I didn't quantified the benefits of Xen3, I really felt it gave me best perfs for both disk access (fossil+venti) and when running as a terminal (graphics). But kvm is to me far more simpler to setup (no dom0) and run. Nicolas
Re: [9fans] Xen4 status
Yes, starting about 5 years ago people began to move to KVM for many reasons. And some very smart people have made it very very fast. If you run 9front, you can take advantage of its virtio drivers, and use the kvm tool instead of qemu. That's a big win right there. But qemu+kvm is quite good in any event. ron
[9fans] revised iwp9 information
http://iwp9.org cheers! - erik
[9fans] EDID
so, if any of you have X11 running, and could do this: xrandr --verbose From an HP laptop running FreeBSD: Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 1280 x 1280 VGA disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) Identifier: 0x41 Timestamp: 81746 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTCs: 0 1 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (0x44) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 304mm x 190mm Identifier: 0x42 Timestamp: 81746 Subpixel: horizontal rgb Gamma: 1.0:1.0:1.0 Brightness: 1.0 Clones: CRTC: 1 CRTCs: 1 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: EDID: 0000320c3201 00120103801e13780ab3859558538a28 2550540001010101010101010101 010101010101121b007d502016303020 360030be1018 00fe004c 475068696c6970734c43440a00fe 004c503134315758332d544c4e3200a7 PANEL_FITTING: full_aspect supported: center full_aspect full BACKLIGHT_CONTROL: combination supported: native legacy combination kernel BACKLIGHT: 0 (0x) range: (0,0) 1280x800 (0x44) 69.3MHz -HSync -VSync *current +preferred h: width 1280 start 1328 end 1360 total 1405 skew0 clock 49.3KHz v: height 800 start 803 end 809 total 822 clock 60.0Hz 1024x768 (0x45) 65.0MHz -HSync -VSync h: width 1024 start 1048 end 1184 total 1344 skew0 clock 48.4KHz v: height 768 start 771 end 777 total 806 clock 60.0Hz 800x600 (0x46) 40.0MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 800 start 840 end 968 total 1056 skew0 clock 37.9KHz v: height 600 start 601 end 605 total 628 clock 60.3Hz 640x480 (0x47) 25.2MHz -HSync -VSync h: width 640 start 656 end 752 total 800 skew0 clock 31.5KHz v: height 480 start 490 end 492 total 525 clock 59.9Hz HDMI-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) Identifier: 0x43 Timestamp: 81746 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTCs: 0 1 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: BROADCAST_RGB: 0 (0x) range: (0,1)
Re: [9fans] EDID
so, if any of you have X11 running, and could do this: xrandr --verbose From an HP laptop running FreeBSD: Oops. Sorry about that all. BLS
Re: [9fans] I need some EDID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/12 1522, ron minnich wrote: so, if any of you have X11 running, and could do this: xrandr --verbose and send the output to me, subject EDID I would NOT be forever in your debt, and I will NOT put your name in lights, but I would appreciate it :-) ron Macbook Pro 15 2012 model $ xrandr --verbose xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1680 x 1028, maximum 1680 x 1050 default connected 1680x1028+0+0 (0x21d) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x210 Timestamp: -1982855953 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: 1680x1050 (0x211) 105.8MHz h: width 1680 start0 end0 total 1680 skew0 clock 63.0KHz v: height 1050 start0 end0 total 1050 clock 60.0Hz 1680x1050 (0x212)3.5MHz h: width 1680 start0 end0 total 1680 skew0 clock 2.1KHz v: height 1050 start0 end0 total 1050 clock 2.0Hz 1440x852 (0x213) 73.6MHz h: width 1440 start0 end0 total 1440 skew0 clock 51.1KHz v: height 852 start0 end0 total 852 clock 60.0Hz 1280x1024 (0x214) 78.6MHz h: width 1280 start0 end0 total 1280 skew0 clock 61.4KHz v: height 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 clock 60.0Hz 1152x720 (0x215) 49.8MHz h: width 1152 start0 end0 total 1152 skew0 clock 43.2KHz v: height 720 start0 end0 total 720 clock 60.0Hz 1024x768 (0x216) 47.2MHz h: width 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 skew0 clock 46.1KHz v: height 768 start0 end0 total 768 clock 60.0Hz 1024x640 (0x217) 39.3MHz h: width 1024 start0 end0 total 1024 skew0 clock 38.4KHz v: height 640 start0 end0 total 640 clock 60.0Hz 1280x800 (0x218) 61.4MHz h: width 1280 start0 end0 total 1280 skew0 clock 48.0KHz v: height 800 start0 end0 total 800 clock 60.0Hz 800x600 (0x219) 28.8MHz h: width 800 start0 end0 total 800 skew0 clock 36.0KHz v: height 600 start0 end0 total 600 clock 60.0Hz 800x500 (0x21a) 24.0MHz h: width 800 start0 end0 total 800 skew0 clock 30.0KHz v: height 500 start0 end0 total 500 clock 60.0Hz 640x480 (0x21b) 18.4MHz h: width 640 start0 end0 total 640 skew0 clock 28.8KHz v: height 480 start0 end0 total 480 clock 60.0Hz 720x480 (0x21c) 20.7MHz h: width 720 start0 end0 total 720 skew0 clock 28.8KHz v: height 480 start0 end0 total 480 clock 60.0Hz 1680x1028 (0x21d)1.7MHz *current h: width 1680 start0 end0 total 1680 skew0 clock 1.0KHz v: height 1028 start0 end0 total 1028 clock 1.0Hz - -- Derek aka goozbach -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQhhy1AAoJECcWlbcE84qz05QP/1N+/WZDzJ4LshjaSD+vBiSz swQuVKpEE7OrrQ1gUX+On2jFRa/LjG6Z4fGkPylEr6PHU4xHBzbXgOvnPvbvJluN +wzIkwkdUIfvnRDaomRx21XFDa+9AuEg8w/TRXLTzH54XhXrnkajwxnQl2WqKzze cuJOgC/cwzX0cTMCTvcKXxpbpULRnQps8U1WnSHM1Kk+aRVtdf3efxgoviUQcGse wuQX1T2FFcdxsLPXzggsVTzvck497J5fYdYZ9MsSLDmt3uj0SSTrKEllORllNym3 k5XlQRgEXrfEF0XW388HsCaV7hBueQyI35zobbEBuGeJCuVqY5yDOujdzYBYLhTx x3+M+2SpO/vEW5iZtLUQr7w4gC+aEF1gKeb1z9FoO6tROrroLGiN6gi0aeHvp02d PrxuzB0+eJX8/1nPoDJBFOS7rKyweBbb8B/9EbUFw1zGQBKxX56gUr5ojfx7hGTr muRkuGfD6f17eOzERnXSqTtpqKnfyQHyKpAlWEaIjc1BcL8J5GZ22mx/sTlow4v9 M29z1QJr3/fjS2q3207fyYGucacz6qXceEE7YFU/v9fWXuc9V9qndEQAL0OWb5BN VYsrIvsy6jyrHUJI+87Ol57iOaJIOQghcR62NNcLpT+sKAPMJjmNOyJtUZ5QsugQ 2NNDHHL3QwCilEOc6ICe =qibx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [9fans] EDID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/23/12 0017, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote: so, if any of you have X11 running, and could do this: xrandr --verbose From an HP laptop running FreeBSD: Oops. Sorry about that all. BLS looks like I did the same thing. Sorry. - -- Derek aka goozbach -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQhh4iAAoJECcWlbcE84qz2nwP/i0FbFpvc6RplOVhDW76f4VJ 0bhaw5bHbbgmK3pDys82i1DHM87jl9A/+Rvqd9N8kHSRQu/N/4Zrk7Dx0xnhEQcw 5PI5IaETgRGuoywT1TOfvhHrSjNyL/dwbDbXmoj9K+OxgKoDEQ5x9hTBsg0SukFu jnjbOM3X/0YUBbi6Z7NNbrIEKv3hXarcahPVMy9MZ75Y+bHI4obW0TEpdw4B3hMC qZLQ9xYiqegNOISZxEcbPJFF8hCpZxRCocvMB7DvM6TXExnF1UkG93V8rCH1txAG KMhqKM5f/O+eI+lXSjVmk5ll4DDGUB4V2bjbWUi3/vVHazIRMo16TA86H2/GGIfF UwCFsK1++eOh9nyX6HRI3v9Vm+i5XAu5ugDY29nsn5WWVxaQLDsEFoZNmdgRhzJ9 fpW1S+pUDZfERiPuvs4E2pgE9gmZOY26dG4N8pF7ZHROxpZNVNhOLLMqWSVfntAT y9YoQ5WIbz7o+6xJR7Q8NwvgaHOkSHeKJ2SgjrmKXwAO0bUnkoxhXrecsuczXdrA DvfPV63Ubk6SuZnflruJvOVAFzYKplw8pXEUq8CsNn2Y1JESGstwo8sj/DP/WnX6 NPEnygVm7wQDwa6mrjmdVIKyzM0iY2t2QxZPHQSQ0bFhazh3I+mhQT8/0UaXAyXw 1iOH5hFKz1laOIJWqrqH =xmsK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[9fans] 9grid?
Is 9grid still around? Has much progress been made on the viability of 9grid as a production resource in the past few years? Lots of the web data is down, so I'd love to hear from anyone using/working on 9grid resources? Thanks, D
