kenfs(of course 64 bit)+auth server +++9pi terminal/cpu server
may be best for home use...
Kenji
> not a fair comparsion.
Yes, I'd have been more specific.
my intension was cwfs > fossil+venti of 9atom >> fossil+venti labs.
I did not consider kenfs itself, because I consider it should be
file+auth+cpu server. The last is not important, but for drawterm
from others.
Recent kenfs can be such
Quoting Yoann Padioleau :
I’m trying to make a tutorial explaining the code of a not too large kernel
(9), but there are too many things to explain so I have to cut things.
So having a simple fs which does not require to explain
9p, the rpc, the mount device, etc would be great.
I know that expl
> I’m trying to make a tutorial explaining the code of
> a not too large kernel (9), but there are too many
> things to explain so I have to cut things. So having
> a simple fs which does not require to explain 9p, the
> rpc, the mount device, etc would be great.
In that case, I'd suggest using d
I’m trying to make a tutorial explaining the code of a not too large kernel
(9), but there are too many things to explain so I have to cut things.
So having a simple fs which does not require to explain
9p, the rpc, the mount device, etc would be great.
I know that explaining plan9 without 9p is ki
> I’m looking for a very simple in-kernel filesystem.
What's motivating the desire for to be in-kernel? Nearly,
every file system in Plan 9 runs in user space. All the
ones that have been mentioned do. The only in-kernel
file system in the labs' distribution is devroot which is
read-only and in
You van take a look to paqfs(4) (read-only) or flashfs(4).
--
David du Colombier
I don't know anything about ramfs but maybe you can modify it to read
all disk from storage then write back when done? Sounds really
inefficient though. Maybe if it was done with system files it'd be
more practical. AFAIK, but a bit off topic, DamnSmallLinux can do
this. Maybe you'd like to check t
But I would like something that actually can persist … a real but simple storage
persistent filesystem.
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:57 AM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> /sys/src/cmd/ramfs.c?
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the simplest storage filesy
/sys/src/cmd/ramfs.c?
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the simplest storage filesystem in terms of code size in plan9?
> I’m looking for a very simple in-kernel filesystem. Maybe older version of
> plan9
> was including such a filesystem? On Linux for in
Hi,
What is the simplest storage filesystem in terms of code size in plan9?
I’m looking for a very simple in-kernel filesystem. Maybe older version of plan9
was including such a filesystem? On Linux for instance the minixfs was probably
the simplest filesystem. The dos must also be simple but it’s
On Tue Jul 15 12:31:57 EDT 2014, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> not a fair comparsion.
>
> i'd look into kenfs for a fileserver only machine. might
> require some time to get it to work with your hardware tho.
if you have a recent 64-bit intel machine, the hardware support
should be nearly the
not a fair comparsion.
i'd look into kenfs for a fileserver only machine. might
require some time to get it to work with your hardware tho.
--
cinap
On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:13 , kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> I've experienced three kinds of Plan9 file servers,
> Lab's one, 9atom and plan9front.
Can you clarify which file server, specifically, you're comparing for each of
these? The Labs doesn't distribute kenfs any more, and venti+fossil i
14 matches
Mail list logo
