Re: [9fans] pthreads
2008-12-16 23:16 GMT+01:00 Steve Simon: > I have a distant memory that somone implemented some of POSIX pthreads > on plan9, i.e. I want to compile programs that use pthreads under APE. > > anyone got any pointers? > Hi Steve, did you find anything (even incomplete) back then? Giacomo
Re: [9fans] pthreads
https://bitbucket.org/mveety/9front-ports/src/9de20d22612a/ape-libs/pth/?at=default i have no idea if it works. ymmv. On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Giacomo Tesiowrote: > 2008-12-16 23:16 GMT+01:00 Steve Simon : >> >> I have a distant memory that somone implemented some of POSIX pthreads >> on plan9, i.e. I want to compile programs that use pthreads under APE. >> >> anyone got any pointers? > > > Hi Steve, did you find anything (even incomplete) back then? > > > Giacomo
[9fans] u9fs sources
Hi, anybody knows where the u9fs sources are currently maintained? I have just found https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/u9fs but it's only linked by an old googlecode repo: I was unable to find any official link in the bell labs pages. Giacomo
Re: [9fans] u9fs sources
> Hi, anybody knows where the u9fs sources are currently maintained? > > I have just found https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/u9fs but it's > only linked by an old googlecode repo: I was unable to find any official > link in the bell labs pages. I don't think it is currently maintained, but Plan 9 ships with a copy of it under /sys/src/cmd/unix. I used that as the basis of the OpenBSD port. sl
Re: [9fans] pthreads
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 12.26.54 Nick Owens wrote: > https://bitbucket.org/mveety/9front-ports/src/9de20d22612a/ape-libs/pth/?at= > default > > i have no idea if it works. ymmv. it used to work (at least the tests that comes with pth, and the oracle/ sleepycat db ...) I was once curious to try to re-compile python using pth but never did.
Re: [9fans] u9fs sources
> I don't think it is currently maintained, but Plan 9 ships with a copy > of it under /sys/src/cmd/unix. I used that as the basis of the OpenBSD > port. I have it on my list of urgent tasks to fix u9fs. The more recent copy (details need investigating) fails on NetBSD when encountering group IDs that don't have a matching value in /etc/group as well as under more mysterious circumstances. The older copy works adequately (very similar platform, not identical), but it seems to care much less about group IDs and it seems a waste that somebody would have done a lot of work in vain. I can find out more about each, but if someone else is willing to help, I'd also like to apply similar expertise to add ownership and permission settings to NetBSD's variation of v9fs which I presume is an analogous problem? So, feel free to nudge me, if you can add to my rather limited skills, the hardware can be made available for development and testing. Lucio.