Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread Bruce Ellis
an alternative is just to have an exclude file listing files/directories that cannot be read or walked to. brucee On 15 February 2016 at 12:05, arisawa wrote: > Hello, > > > 2016/02/15 7:57、Charles Forsyth のメール: > > > > > > On 14 February

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread arisawa
Hello, > 2016/02/15 7:57、Charles Forsyth のメール: > > > On 14 February 2016 at 16:38, wrote: > i could imagine the filtering being usefull when cpu'ing to foreign machines, > as a server can easily compromize your system when cpu exports your

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 14 February 2016 at 16:38, wrote: > i could imagine the filtering being usefull when cpu'ing to foreign > machines, > as a server can easily compromize your system when cpu exports your whole > local namespace > You'd still be better off using a custom nsfile to

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 13 February 2016 at 14:26, Charles Forsyth wrote: > I really wonder about the pattern-matching code being there at all. One interesting thing about the implementation is that it goes so far as to edit the result of directory reads, so excluded names can't be seen

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 14 February 2016 at 10:27, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > You mean this? No, there was a handful of Plan 9 patents, mainly to do with aspects and applications of computable name spaces and related services.

[9fans] plan9.ini: ipconfig and bootargs

2016-02-14 Thread tlaronde
Hello, When trying to re-install a Plan9 on a new node, being unable, with the kernel compiled present on the CDROM image, to access a FAT or an iso image of a root file system, I went to a combination of a minimal sketch of a plan9 slice, with a 9fat made "by hand" (from an already installed

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread cinap_lenrek
i could imagine the filtering being usefull when cpu'ing to foreign machines, as a server can easily compromize your system when cpu exports your whole local namespace. i dont know if anyone has done this tho. -- cinap

Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs

2016-02-14 Thread hiro
You mean this? http://inventors.about.com/od/tstartinventions/ss/TelephonePatent.htm On 2/14/16, Prof Brucee wrote: > Totally agree. I've never needed exportfs filtering. It's not in the > patent. > On 14/02/2016 1:27 AM, "Charles Forsyth"