Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Ouch. I'd hate to think the work I did on that is somehow associated with 9front. Let's leave the pettiness behind.

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 07:32:12PM -0600, Steven Stallion wrote: > Ouch. I'd hate to think the work I did on that is somehow associated > with 9front. If you don't want people to use it, don't put it on the internet. khm

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Ouch. I'd hate to think the work I did on that is somehow associated with 9front. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >> Yes, when sources was doomed, I enthusiastically set it up, although I >> think it was bitbucket not github, > > > And the reason I

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Yes, when sources was doomed, I enthusiastically set it up, although I think it was bitbucket not github, And the reason I liked the bitbucket repo is because it's accessible using hg, for which we have a Plan9 port that does get some TLC thanks to the 9front folks.

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

"we never know when plan9.bell-labs.com will be back." Yes, yes we do. Not. On 5 January 2018 at 16:35, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How about contrib? It would be nice to have something to fall back on > > when the plug is finally pulled. > > We could use the

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Yes, when sources was doomed, I enthusiastically set it up, although I think it was bitbucket not github, but I was then embarrassed to be reminded that David du Colombier had been maintaining something similar for quite some time, so I stopped. On 5 January 2018 at 16:28, David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

> Didn't Charles Forsyth have a github or similar such repository with a copy > of the Labs sources? That was even seeing sporadic updates? I'm sure I > browsed it last fall, but I can't find it now. Few years ago, I've made a GitHub repository with full /n/sources/plan9 history, if that's what

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Everyone is naming sites to check out, but which one has the right contents, is being maintained, and will be stable? Didn't Charles Forsyth have a github or similar such repository with a copy of the Labs sources? That was even seeing sporadic updates? I'm sure I browsed it last fall, but

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:08:58PM +1100, Rob Pike wrote: > Everyone is naming sites to check out, but which one has the right > contents, is being maintained, and will be stable? That's never existed to begin with. Nothing's changed to suddenly make it likely. khm

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

How about contrib? It would be nice to have something to fall back on when the plug is finally pulled. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:13 AM, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've just updated /n/sources on 9p.io with a snapshot from 2017-12-15. > > Thanks for the reminding! > > -- > David

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

I've just updated /n/sources on 9p.io with a snapshot from 2017-12-15. Thanks for the reminding! -- David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

> Not all up to date, I think. Patch directory appears to be > a snapshot from March 2016, and contrib/miller/9/bcm has > nothing newer than July 2015. Yes, /n/sources has been still evolving on plan9.bell-labs.com, so there are some updates to catch up. I'll update /n/sources from my latest

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

> I've been running 9p.io since February 2014. > > It's a complete and up-to-date copy of plan9.bell-labs.com. Not all up to date, I think. Patch directory appears to be a snapshot from March 2016, and contrib/miller/9/bcm has nothing newer than July 2015.

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

On the other hand, plan9.io is run by Sevki Hasirci. It has been set up in January 2016, using 9p.io as a basis, to serve as a fallback mirror. However, plan9.io is not as complete as 9p.io and doesn't include services such as FTP, 9P or wikifs. I don't know about the other mirrors. -- David

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

> Everyone is naming sites to check out, but which one has the right contents, > is being maintained, and will be stable? I've been running 9p.io since February 2014. It's a complete and up-to-date copy of plan9.bell-labs.com. It includes the following services: - HTTP and HTTPS (full

Re: [9fans] R.I.P cs.bell-labs.com

Everyone is naming sites to check out, but which one has the right contents, is being maintained, and will be stable? -rob On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:42 PM, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > Take a look to https://9p.io/ > > -- > David du Colombier > >