On 2/14/18, Dave MacFarlane wrote:
> It's written in Go, which means it'll only work on platforms that Go
> supports (I think there's a list somewhere on the Go wiki, but it's some
> subset of 386/arm/amd64 depending on which fork
On Feb 14, 2018, at 2:18 AM, Rui Carmo wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2018, at 00:31, s...@9front.org wrote:
>> 1.) is the wrong approach. Just build inside Plan 9.
> You missed the rest of the thread.
I read the entire thread but I didn’t see this point specifically
I am still using and maintaining 9atom. I just have a busy schedule so read the list less.- erikOn Feb 11, 2018 14:48, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> 9atom and 9front are both actively maintained.
It seems like 9atom is not actually actively maintained any
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018, at 11:32 AM, hiro wrote:
> git has a bad user interface, it is not made for casual users.
I've been using it casually for a couple of weeks, it's been bearable. Perhaps
that's because one of the repos only has occasional commits from one other
person, and the other is
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Camolês wrote:
> I understand the sunken cost fallacy, but seriously, there's a reason
> handwriting on tablets is not that much used despite the existence of
> softwares for such. It can be useful when it comes to short annotations, but
> it's really
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> 2018-02-12 14:05 GMT+01:00 Ethan Grammatikidis :
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> >> 2018-02-12 2:10 GMT+01:00 Ethan Grammatikidis :
> >>> linux-style package managers and
On Feb 14, 2018 02:22, "Rui Carmo" wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2018, at 01:47, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Dave MacFarlane's git client (dgit) does a decent job on plan9.
This interests me greatly. Last time I checked there wasn’t a good enough
got client, so I
git has a bad user interface, it is not made for casual users.
On 2/14/18, Steve Simon wrote:
> re git frowned upon.
> i think git is frowned upon because porting it would be a massive effort due
> to its many dependencies, whist python has been ported and mercurial just
It's a shame, cause GIT itself is mostly C, no doubt
re git frowned upon.
i think git is frowned upon because porting it would be a massive effort due to
its many dependencies, whist python has been ported and mercurial just works.
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 23:37, Rui Carmo wrote:
>>> On 13 Feb 2018, at
i spoke too soon, the labs website went a while ago, but the sources machine
has returned, well i was able to access it last week.
last chance (i suspect) for those wanting to download the contrib dirs before
they disappear - i got mine
On 13 Feb 2018, at 23:13, Lyndon
Mail list logo