I would like to run 9legacy on OpenBSD as well. Unfortunately, I'm still
learning and even though finding and ideally contributing solutions to such
bugs is a distant goal of mine, my only current option is to run on 9front.
In the wiki (https://wiki.9front.org/openbsd-vmm) it says:
"Since VMM
On Wednesday, 2 February 2022, at 7:22 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> This one statement: "Berkeley stopped their distribution of BSD
systems right after they were forced to remove the toolchain." is
completely wrong. I just asked the people who were there, on TUHS, and
they confirmed my memory: DARPA
This one statement: "Berkeley stopped their distribution of BSD
systems right after they were forced to remove the toolchain." is
completely wrong. I just asked the people who were there, on TUHS, and
they confirmed my memory: DARPA funding for BSD support ended in 1995,
and that was probably the
Quoth Wes Kussmaul :
>
> Hiro, you have absolutely hit the nail on the head.
>
> So, how do you add rationality and reliability to the
> dpkg-app/play-store idea?
>
> Answer: emulate the ways this has been done for centuries in the
> physical world.
I'd like to think we've progressed past
> I don't know whether pandoc runs
> on Plan 9.
It is Haskell, so I suspect not.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te71ff4b45d15900f-M78a822fd2c0d5283486b02f4
Delivery options:
On 2/1/22 08:20, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
Quoth Ben Hancock :
This is not Plan 9 specific
Are you implying it runs on plan 9 at all?
You're right - I should have clarified: I don't know whether pandoc runs
on Plan 9. I thought I would suggest just in case OP was looking at
tools from
On 2/1/22 17:47, hiro wrote:
I believe that David is right that it was a combination of running on
really low-end hardware (in the early days, Torvalds accepted patches for
just about anything), and a similarly low barrier to entry (others
elsewhere have quipped about having to appease, "the
as a trackpoint fanatic i can tell you:
no, i can't sweep as easily as with a physical mouse.
but if a physical mouse is 10/10, and a smartphone is 1/10, then a
touchpad is 3/10 and a trackpoint is 8/10 for my purposes.
the only thing that makes this more steep is gaming: there the mouse
is much
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022, at 04:25, Ben Hancock wrote:
> Do you find you're able to sweep lines as easily using it in acme as with a
> physical mouse?
can't really say: i'm not a heavy acme user, and i haven't had a mouse in
years. shinobi does feel pretty close to a thinkpad, so you should be able
