On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 02:42:06PM +, smi...@zenzebra.mv.com wrote:
Hello,
Back in 2009, someone on this list posted about encrypting /usr on a
Plan 9 laptop they had. Does anyone know how to encrypt a file system
on Plan 9? (I'm talking about encrypting the storage on disk, not just
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:53:30PM +0100, Nemo wrote:
i reply myself; i think they use sst to mix multimedia streams, and
in that case a lost packet in one stream (say text) would
delay other streams (say audio) that do not need to be delayed if
you use sst.
But otherwise I still think
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:22:25PM -0500, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
usb has advanced a little; we can see usb devices now but attempts to
read or write them hang. I don't know of progress on flash access or
anything else.
in the inferno port i've been able to access the nand flash:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 08:24:45AM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
ps. if you wanted to hide this ugliness of passing a buffer and
fd to a child process instead of just passing an fd, you could
still solve it in userland without a syscall. Write a library
that does buffered IO. Include unget() if
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:50:18PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
I'd like to have a hack session the wed. morning before IWP9.
What I'd like to propose is a sheeva plugfest. People commit to bringing a
plug
and we get them set up to run Plan 9.
Any interest?
inferno might be a good target
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:50:42AM -0600, Daniel Lyons wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Akshat Kumar wrote:
Suggestions (model, company, etc.) welcome.
Although, this thing can do photoscanning, copying,
and faxing. I make great use of the former two,
along with printing (of course).
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote:
perhaps i've been asleep at the swtch, but i don't recall seing writes
on closed channels terminate programs with a note.
sys: write on closed pipe
mainly to kill off a pipeline when the thing at the end has finished.
i
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:25:19AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
i think the general idea is that if you want to do this between
arbitrary machines, you provide a 9p interface. you can think
of 9p as a channel with a predefined set of messages. acme
does this. kernel devices do this.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:54:34AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
as an old example, i think that the lab's use of worm storage
for the main file server was incredibly insightful.
what could we do today, but don't quite dare?
stop writing all programs in C, and start writing them in a
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Steve Simon wrote:
I am interested in the idea of adding some kind of resource limits
to plan9. If they existsed I would probably open it up to external
users, however different things would worry me:
CPU use
Implement the Fair share scheduler
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:25:40PM -0500, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Again, that's not to say that there aren't other valid motivators
for some centralized functionality. It's just that in my opinion,
we're at the point were if it's raw cycles we need, we'll have
to be looking at a large
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 07:48:54AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
We haven't brought up SSL yet, so Eve can read our exchanged random
numbers... now these values get shoved into SHA-1 (along with the 56 bits of
entropy from Kn derived from p9any authentication) before being used to make
the
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0500, Anthony Sorace wrote:
if you want to work on it some, this message talks about getting
inferno working on OpenBSD using the rthreads library (the pending
replacement for the userland threads russ talked about):
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:16:39PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Nov 8, 2008, at 11:15 AM, John Barham wrote:
It seems that MS is pushing webdav hard.
that's what's needed when heavy things run out of fuel.
Even as a potential substitute for ftp webdav is a farce. Speaking
from
14 matches
Mail list logo
