Never mind, https://iwp9.org/10iwp9proceedings.pdf
> On Apr 12, 2024, at 06:56, David Arnold wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The vetting process needs some work, lads.
>
> More heresy than trolling, perhaps?
>
> It was thought-provoking for me. I wished I was there for the bar session
> afterwards.
>
Where’s the link? I haven’t seen one yet for reading papers in advance. Still
one hour to go…
> On Apr 12, 2024, at 06:04, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> "Do we really have to have our own kernel? What are
> the benefits?" ...
>
> The IWP9 paper titled "centre, left and right" looks like
> a
> I recently set up NFS exports on a server on my local intranet. I can mount
> NFS directories after running nfs(4) but when I tried to do a small dircp(1)
> it invariably failed at the same point for each of the directories I tried:
>
> term% nfs -p 666 -u /lib/ndb/glenda.passwd
I recently set up NFS exports on a server on my local intranet. I can mount
NFS directories after running nfs(4) but when I tried to do a small dircp(1) it
invariably failed at the same point for each of the directories I tried:
term% nfs -p 666 -u /lib/ndb/glenda.passwd
[tswoskow...@gmail.com]
> I had a thought a while back: could one pilfer plan 9's libc and
> kernel guts to build an embedded c library à la newlib? The idea is a
> native hosted plan 9 microcontroller lab similar to arduino and your
> microcontroller program would look like a bare metal plan 9
9p(2) says the following about
char* (*walk1)(Fid *fid, char *name, Qid *qid);
| Because implementing the full walk message is intricate and prone to
| error, the helper routine walkandclone will handle the request given
| pointers to two functions walk1 and (optionally) clone. [...] Walk1
|
[9f...@hamnavoe.com]
> A couple of people have speculated about what exactly is in the 9pi SD card
> image.
Many thanks for this image. I had also been wondering about it until
I asked and you kindly answered. I'm very glad to have access to an
image that is close to the 4th Edition, while
[lucio.d...@gmail.com]
> I think what has kept Plan 9 ticking for the past 25 years or more, is
> that this community is small enough to keep connected to the "product"
> in its more abstract sense. Whatever that sense is, it is what we
> share and, presumably, appreciate, so we ought to preserve
I am very grateful for Richard Miller's ready-made 9pi image.
When I first got to know about Plan 9 many years ago, there was only a
single distribution of it I believe.
I had assumed I was running something close to that distribution, with
an updated kernel, but I have since been pleasantly
> We are pleased to announce the creation of the Plan 9 Foundation.
This is excellent news. I am especially excited to see some familiar
names in the signature (the familiarity is one-directional, partly
from when I was lurking around Plan 9 lists back in the 2000s).
Would be keen to learn
[eeke...@fastmail.fm]
> I specifically say "more popular" because popularity affects the
number of developers available.
Off-topic and perhaps unpopular view, but I *like* the fact that Plan
9 is not (significantly) more popular. Popularity has ruined many a
promising creation.
Although please
[pouya+lists.9f...@nohup.io]
> Worked for 2.4GHz but not for 5GHz.
I stand corrected. There was a mix-up with an older 3b, which only
has 2.4GHz (too many rpis lying around). Sorry about the confusion.
Pouya
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
ht
Thank you all for your feedback.
I have combined my answers to a few responses below.
> [pouya+lists.9f...@nohup.io]
>> I was looking for a way to send emails from different addresses with
>> Acme Mail
[9f...@hamnavoe.com]
> That's what /mail/box/$user/pipefrom is for. (No
I was looking for a way to send emails from different addresses with
Acme Mail, as I use + address suffixes to sort incoming mail and
occasionally need to send emails from the same (e.g. to this mailing
list). Not finding a convenient way, I committed a bad hack to
include an optional From: line
14 matches
Mail list logo
