Re: [9fans] 9vx and ubuntu 10.04LTS
The update to 10.04 has overloaded my email with messages from ubuntu's dosemu forum. Basically the same issue as with 9vx. A fix [sic] is suggested. So, question is: On Sat, 1 May 2010 23:36:08 +0200 Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote: Fwiw, 9vx does build and run fine on 10.04 here. Lemme know if I can give you some relevant info which might help. Cheers, Mathieu Mathieu: have you perhaps applied the fix to run some emulator, and it's fixing 9vx? -- sixforty s...@sixforty.net
Re: [9fans] 9vx and ubuntu 10.04LTS
On Tue, 4 May 2010 11:06:29 +0200 Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote: Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's where the difference lies. How do I check if that fix you're speaking of is installed or not? Cheers, Mathieu /sbin/sysctl vm.mmap_min_addr A setting of 0 indicates that the patch has been applied. Often, root doesn't need it, but sometimes does. And this is my last post until I find where my email header settings have been hidden, and exterminate them. Sorry. sixforty s...@sixforty.net
Re: [9fans] (no subject)
Jeff Sickel wrote: On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:48 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote: sure but what's the point? Couldn't you grab one of the forth interpreters? Forth on Plan 9? That would be great. Then I'd have a bit more leverage in getting a new PIC based board to talk with Plan 9. (brucee's recent 9p example's notwithstanding) -jas Someone in freenode #forth said they'd just ported 4tH to Plan 9. I don't log IRC, wish I'd payed more attention. Maybe they've shared it by now. I don't doubt them, as 4tH's source comes with instructions on how to build with no libs and only 2 syscalls (1 is 'printf' replacement). sixforty
