Re: [9fans] [sources] applied patch: /n/atom/patch/applied/termrcnodhcp

2013-10-15 Thread Daode
Hello, erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote: |email | quans...@quanstro.net |readme | don't dhcp by default. it looks like a hang. [.] |+ #if(! test -e /net/ipifc/0/ctl || ~ 127.0.0.1 `{cat /net/ipifc/0/local}) |+ # ip/ipconfig /dev/null [2=1] [.] after looking into the

Re: [9fans] [sources] applied patch: /n/atom/patch/applied/termrcnodhcp

2013-10-15 Thread erik quanstrom
then each tick sleeps ~1 second (sometimes a tick needed 3 in the tests i've done). But if i add hmm. can you explain more about the environment, and kernel you were using? i'd like to correct the kernel timing. sleep(n) must be fairly accurate. i would define that as accurate to ±1/HZ on

Re: [9fans] [sources] applied patch: /n/atom/patch/applied/termrcnodhcp

2013-10-15 Thread Daode
hmm, i'm braindead. And that made it especially hard to deal with ipconfig(8): by default, ipconfig exits after trying DHCP for 15 seconds with no answer --steffen ---BeginMessage--- Hello, erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote: |email | quans...@quanstro.net |readme | don't

Re: [9fans] [sources] applied patch: /n/atom/patch/applied/termrcnodhcp

2013-10-15 Thread Daode
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote: |- 9fans | |thanks for the interest! no, i'm just totally brain dead.

Re: [9fans] [sources] applied patch: /n/atom/patch/applied/termrcnodhcp

2013-10-15 Thread erik quanstrom
On Tue Oct 15 09:20:16 EDT 2013, sdao...@gmail.com wrote: erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote: |- 9fans | |thanks for the interest! no, i'm just totally brain dead. i didn't think so. seems like sleep should be fixed. but i need more information on your environment to fix