In article ionvtt$p6n$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
In article inuqri$eqi$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
In article insdeo$km5$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
As mentioned in a post
what's weird is I'm just not seeing any of these problems. Good fun.
ron
In article 90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com,
Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Just a note that we've
In article inuqri$eqi$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
In article insdeo$km5$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing
In article a260bb06-00d9-43bc-89ae-6f5b08cb3...@gmail.com,
David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying
In article ec9ea766ee9a078a26ff902ed3e27...@proxima.alt.za,
Lucio De Re lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks
cd /sys/src/cmd
for (d in 5?) @{cd $d mk install}
I'm not going to try that now...
I am :) Well, actually, given the /bin/ape/sh problem,
what I'm going to try to do is try to set up an alternative
9vx.OSX install from scratch, and apply the latter above instead
of the earlier
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, com...@panix.com (Greg Comeau) wrote:
In article a260bb06-00d9-43bc-89ae-6f5b08cb3...@gmail.com,
David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
the way to do this is
cd
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
since doing the mk's. Obviously something in those builds
In article 784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com,
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be
In article 90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com,
Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Great, 9vx is so
In article 784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com,
erik quanstrom quans...@labs.coraid.com wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be
In article BANLkTi=djiqswgyncojzoopvffkybai...@mail.gmail.com,
ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
that's one of the
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
that's one of the
In article insdeo$km5$1...@panix1.panix.com,
Greg Comeau com...@comeaucomputing.com wrote:
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk mk clean
Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what
i'm not keen on disks within disks because you either have to waste
lots of space or risk running out of it.
On 7 April 2011 16:45, Paul Lalonde paul.a.lalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file. Disk Utility lets you make a
On Fri Apr 8 05:10:49 EDT 2011, rogpe...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm not keen on disks within disks because you either have to waste
lots of space or risk running out of it.
true, but ...
is disk space your most constrained resource?
is a free byte on disk wasted or not?
i bought the smallest
We have an Intel based OS X 10.4.11 running 9vx.OSX 0.12
Two questions:
1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break? Also, forward looking,
what about with beta for the next OS X which I understand will be
released this
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
What's the easiest way to get the binaries and end-user install tree
for the
1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:34 PM, com...@panix.com (Greg Comeau) wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
What's the easiest way
I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work out.
ron
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
case-sensitive. Big win, and though you have to size the FS ahead, it's
also nice to have my 9vx install all in one disk file for moving to other
1s/case-insensitive/case-sensitive/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Paul Lalonde paul.a.lalo...@gmail.comwrote:
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
case-sensitive. Big win, and
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Paul Lalonde paul.a.lalo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
case-sensitive. Big win, and though you have to size the FS
On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:45, Paul Lalonde wrote:
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file.
Just in case this wasn't obvious, you can do this with the real, on-disk
filesystem, too. There's no upgrading an existing FS, so this is most
practical when
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Anthony Sorace a...@9srv.net wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:45, Paul Lalonde wrote:
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file.
Just in case this wasn't obvious, you can do this with the real, on-disk
filesystem, too.
would a better solution be a modification to 9vx to allow it to generate virtual
disks in a file. Then you could start fossil/kfs/cwfs/pacfs/other in plan9 and
have the same functionality and the ability to have the filesystem work exactly
like plan9 - permissions, dates, append only files etc.
would a better solution be a modification to 9vx to allow it to generate
virtual
disks in a file. Then you could start fossil/kfs/cwfs/pacfs/other in plan9 and
have the same functionality and the ability to have the filesystem work
exactly
like plan9 - permissions, dates, append only files
31 matches
Mail list logo
